JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 44(10): 600-610 1980
© 1980 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bawden, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bawden, J.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 44, Issue 10, 600-610
Copyright © 1980 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

The scope and objectives of graduate dental education

JW Bawden

Seven objectives of graduate dental education (GDE) and the current types of GDE programs are defined and discussed. The author recommends that objectives for GDE should be established, and that each GDE program should be designed and designated to meet specific objectives that are appropriate to the setting and resources available. The author further recommends that GDE programs should be evaluated with respect to attainment of their own designated objectives and also against standards set by the Commission on Accreditation of Dental and Dental Auxiliary Education (now the Commission on Dental Accreditation). The author notes that this latter commission must have adequate financial support and staffing to be able to evaluate many diverse GDE programs. Forces that have contributed to the gradual shaping of GDE programs are described, including societal need, institutional motivation, specialty organizations, and the Commission on Accreditation. The availability of money is cited as the catalytic component that often determines the balance among these forces. The author recommends that long-term objectives should not restrict program diversity and that societal need should be the paramount factor giving shape to future GDE programs. The author suggests that an emphasis on quality research training programs may prove most socially advantageous if advances in knowledge can prevent dental problems. The author also recommends that predoctoral students should have adequate information and counseling resources to enable them to make wise career decisions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Dental Education Association.