|
|
||||||||
Articles |
This study evaluated the accuracy of manual and academic variables in predicting preclinical operative technique performance. In addition, it tested and compared two teaching methods and their effects on performance outcomes. Simple correlations and stepwise multiple regression analysis were used. Although correlations were low, they were significant for predicting performance using the Perceptual Motor Ability Test (PMAT) of the Dental Admission Test (DAT). The treatment of the two groups showed that students with low or average two dimension (2D) scores on the PMAT benefited from an alternate teaching method in the preclinical operative technique course.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Curtis, S. L. Lind, S. Brear, and F. C. Finzen The Correlation of Student Performance in Preclinical and Clinical Prosthodontic Assessments J Dent Educ., March 1, 2007; 71(3): 365 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Park, S. M. Susarla, and W. Massey Do Admissions Data and NBDE Part I Scores Predict Clinical Performance Among Dental Students? J Dent Educ., May 1, 2006; 70(5): 518 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Wilson, K. B. Waldman, and G. MacDonald An Analysis of Abilities Underlying Early Periodontal Skill Development of Dental Students Eval Health Prof, March 1, 1991; 14(1): 41 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |