JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 47(9): 615-622 1983
© 1983 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Handelman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Balzer, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Handelman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Balzer, J
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 47, Issue 9, 615-622
Copyright © 1983 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Impact of general practice residency training on dentists and dental practice

SL Handelman, DH Blandford, and J Balzer

This study compared dentists who had completed general practice residency (GPR) training programs in 1974-76 with a similar group of dentists who had not (NGPR). Response to a mailed questionnaire indicated that the GPR group performed more oral surgery, periodontal surgery, and complex endodontic procedures and spent more time in the physical evaluation of patients. They also used the medical laboratory more frequently and tended to refer to specialists less often. GPR-trained dentists had more hospital staff appointments, admitted more patients to the hospital, and performed a greater amount and range of services within the hospital than the NGPRs. GPRs tended to subscribe to and read more journals, teach, and publish research papers. There were no differences in participation in continuing education courses and professional meetings or in self-esteem as a general dentist.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Dental Education Association.