JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 49(12): 799-803 1985
© 1985 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolstad, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kolstad, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kolstad, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kolstad, R.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 49, Issue 12, 799-803
Copyright © 1985 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Format selection in machine-scored classroom achievement tests

RK Kolstad, MJ Wagner, and RA Kolstad

Performance on classroom achievement tests should reflect student accomplishment on a targeted set of instructional objectives. One prerequisite for meaningful edumetric assessment is the structuring of each component item in an appropriate format. In a comparative study measuring the effect of item format on student performance, incorrect choices were selected 2.4-fold more frequently on multiple choice items than on their content-identical, multiple true-false derivatives. On similar trials, scores on complex multiple-choice items ranged upward of 20 percent higher than on their content-identical, multiple true-false counterparts. The strengths and weaknesses of various test item formats are discussed and specific recommendations for format selection are made.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Dental Education Association.