JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 49(4): 225-235 1985
© 1985 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bebeau, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yamoor, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bebeau, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yamoor, C.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 49, Issue 4, 225-235
Copyright © 1985 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Measuring dental students' ethical sensitivity

MJ Bebeau, Rest JR, and CM Yamoor

This paper describes the development of stimulus materials and scoring procedures to measure an individual's ability to recognize the ethical issues often hidden within the dentist's professional problems. The importance of this ability is discussed as it relates to other abilities thought to be necessary conditions for ethical or moral behavior. Dental students completed the ethical sensitivity test and Rest's test of moral reasoning. The sensitivity test requires transcribing verbal responses to audio dramas, a technique that: (1) elicits sufficient data for making inferences about ethical sensitivity, (2) produces good interjudge agreement and interrater reliability, and (3) measures variability in student performance. Data indicate high internal consistency compared with previous efforts to measure components of sensitivity (e.g., empathy), acceptable test-retest reliability for a subsample. and the distinctiveness of sensitivity and reasoning scores. The results have broad application for the teaching of ethics and suggest new directions for the study of professional socialization.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
H. M. Sharp and R. A. Kuthy
What Do Dental Students Learn in an Ethics Course? An Analysis of Student-Reported Learning Outcomes
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2008; 72(12): 1450 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
K. Weaver
Ethical Sensitivity: State of Knowledge and Needs for Further Research
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2007; 14(2): 141 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of MacromarketingHome page
S. D. Hunt and S. J. Vitell
The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Revision and Three Questions
Journal of Macromarketing, December 1, 2006; 26(2): 143 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
L. K. Trevino, G. R. Weaver, and S. J. Reynolds
Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review
Journal of Management, December 1, 2006; 32(6): 951 - 990.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
L. E. Jenson
Why Our Ethics Curricula Do Work
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2005; 69(2): 225 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
Z. N. Al-Dwairi and E.M. Al-Waheidi
Cheating Behaviors of Dental Students
J Dent Educ., November 1, 2004; 68(11): 1192 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
F. K. Oser
Chapter 2: Moral Perspectives on Teaching
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1994; 20(1): 57 - 127.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
P. O'Keefe and M. Johnston
Perspective Taking and Teacher Effectiveness: A Connecting Thread Through Three Developmental Literatures
Journal of Teacher Education, May 1, 1989; 40(3): 20 - 26.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Dental Education Association.