|
|
||||||||
Articles |
In preclinical dentistry, precise terminal knowledge of results (KR) typically is provided by an instructor when the student has completed all or a portion of a preparation. A contemporary model of psychomotor learning implies that performance can be improved if continual precise KR also is available. This investigation compared a traditional instructional format that provided instructor-generated terminal KR with one that also trained students to generate continual KR using two sections of an operative laboratory (n = 55 each). The dependent variable was student performance on occlusal and mesio-occlusal amalgam preparations. Students in the experimental group significantly outperformed those in the control group on both preparations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Henzi, E. Davis, R. Jasinevicius, and W. Hendricson North american dental students' perspectives about their clinical education. J Dent Educ., April 1, 2006; 70(4): 361 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Haj-Ali and P. Feil Rater reliability: short- and long-term effects of calibration training. J Dent Educ., April 1, 2006; 70(4): 428 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |