Issues in transferring preclinical skill learning to the clinical context

The relationship between student performance in preclinical technique laboratory courses and in clinic is not straightforward. While American dental education in the preclinical courses is effective in teaching mastery of fundamentals to most students and identifying those who should not proceed to patient care, the prediction from technique laboratory performance of who will do well in clinic is weak. Factors accounting for this poor correlation include differences in the mix of skills required in the two contexts, failure to teach for transfer of skills to new settings, and laboratory education practices that create clinically dysfunctional habits. As a means of understanding the transfer issue, a distinction is made among task as given by the instructor, task as interpreted by the student, and task as negotiated in the interpersonal context of dental education.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Curtis, S. L. Lind, S. Brear, and F. C. Finzen The Correlation of Student Performance in Preclinical and Clinical Prosthodontic Assessments J Dent Educ., March 1, 2007; 71(3): 365 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Rich, R. G. Keim, and C. F. Shuler Problem-Based Learning Versus a Traditional Educational Methodology: A Comparison of Preclinical and Clinical Periodontics Performance J Dent Educ., June 1, 2005; 69(6): 649 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Chambers The Effects of Faculty Control of Learning on Student Effort Eval Health Prof, December 1, 1991; 14(4): 438 - 455. [Abstract] [PDF]