JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 52(5): 235-244 1988
© 1988 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, R.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 52, Issue 5, 235-244
Copyright © 1988 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Ten-year study of strategies for teaching clinical inference in predoctoral orthodontic education

RM Jacobs

Dealing with the continuum of malocclusions in general practice requires diagnostic skills that, according to the Council on Dental Education guidelines, should include an ability to evaluate the severity of malocclusions and to assess the degree of treatment difficulty. This level of diagnostic skills is predicated upon the ability to make a judgment on the basis of inherently ill-defined and insufficient data or, in other words, upon the ability to use rules and procedures of clinical inference. However, conventional methods of predoctoral orthodontic instruction appear to be unsuitable for transmitting these complex skills to dental students. For ten years, alternative instructional strategies involving guided discovery learning, repetitive practice in application of facts and principles to real-life problems, and eventually a prescriptive diagnostic model were employed at our institution. Both classroom instruction and evaluation were focused on attaining mastery in two narrowly specified domains: "Evaluating the Severity of Malocclusions" and "Assessing the Degree of Treatment Difficulty." The large proportion of items mastered by students and the high percent correct recorded on multiple-choice examinations suggest that these instructional methods may be effective for teaching clinical inference at the predoctoral level of dental education.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
M. A. Albanese and R. M. Jacobs
Reliability and Validity of A Procedure to Measure Diagnostic Reasoning and Problem-Solving Skills Taught in Predoctoral Orthodontic Education
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 1990; 13(4): 412 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Dental Education Association.