JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 53(12): 712-717 1989
© 1989 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fried, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rubinstein, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fried, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rubinstein, L
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 53, Issue 12, 712-717
Copyright © 1989 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Dental hygienists' anti-tobacco role: educational perspectives

JL Fried and L Rubinstein

Dental hygienists need to assume a proactive health education role concerning tobacco use. To help measure, define, and broaden this role, a study was conducted to assess dental hygienists' current clinical practice behaviors, attitudes, and perceived curriculum adequacy concerning anti-tobacco efforts. The relationships among these variables and respondents' academic degree and year of graduation were analyzed. The study population consisted of a proportionate random sample of 500 dental hygienists in five states and the District of Columbia. A self-administered questionnaire yielded a response rate of 79.4 percent. Based on chi-square analyses of individual items, it was found that, when controlling for degree held, year of graduation was not significantly related to clinical practice behaviors or attitudes, but was significantly related to the majority of curriculum adequacy items. Academic degree, when controlled for year of graduation, was not significantly related to clinical practice behaviors, but was related to one attitude and two curriculum adequacy items. Analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test revealed the following significant relationships for aggregate data: year of graduation and degree held appeared to have no relationship to aggregate clinical practice behaviors or attitudes, M.S. degree respondents assigned higher curriculum adequacy ratings than did other subjects, and respondents who graduated prior to 1972 assigned their curricula more negative adequacy ratings than did all other graduates. The most recent graduates rated their curricula the most positively. The study's overall findings suggest that a fairly well-developed role for dental hygienists in anti-tobacco efforts exists. Given the current emphasis on health promotion, prevention, and holism in the provision of oral health care, it is commendable, but not surprising, that dental hygiene programs appear to have made positive modifications over time in tobacco-related content.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Dental Education Association.