JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 55(5): 316-321 1991
© 1991 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puskas, J.
Right arrow Articles by McCulloch, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Puskas, J.
Right arrow Articles by McCulloch, C.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 55, Issue 5, 316-321
Copyright © 1991 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Comparison of self-instruction methods for teaching diagnostic testing

JC Puskas, K Fung, JD Anderson, P Birek, L Dempster, MW Heft, C Torneck, DW Lewis, and CA McCulloch

In a randomized controlled trial, self-teaching booklets and computer media were evaluated for teaching diagnostic testing to dental students as a foundation for further development of clinical decision making skills. Effectiveness was assessed by pre- and post-tests. Reliability of these test instruments was examined by analyzing the pre- and post-test scores of 49 first year dental students who received no instruction. Forty-one second year dental students were exposed to clinical epidemiological principles applied to endodontic diagnosis through either self-teaching booklets or computer media. No statistically significant difference was found between the mean test scores of the students through self-teaching booklets and computer media. Although first and second year students showed a statistically significant improvement between the pre-test and post-test, the improvement in the second year class was greater. An addendum was later made to the main trial to compare the self-teaching booklet to the traditional lecture format in teaching endodontic diagnosis. Seventy-one third year dental students were exposed to these same materials through either a lecture or the self-teaching booklet and then similarly tested. There was no significant difference between the self-teaching booklet and traditional lecture for the third year students.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
H. Rosenberg, J. Kermalli, E. Freeman, H. Tenenbaum, D. Locker, and H. Cohen
Effectiveness of an Electronic Histology Tutorial for First-Year Dental Students and Improvement in "Normalized" Test Scores
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2006; 70(12): 1339 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dental Education Association.