JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 55(9): 560-564 1991
© 1991 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feil, P
Right arrow Articles by Purk, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Feil, P
Right arrow Articles by Purk, J.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 55, Issue 9, 560-564
Copyright © 1991 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

An experimental evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the leadup activity

P Feil, TR Reed, SD McMillen, JW Killip, and JH Purk

The positive effects of a leadup activity on the production of intracoronal operative preparations have been documented in earlier studies. However, an absence of certain controls may have jeopardized the validity of the earlier study, and an adequate test of the innovation's efficiency was not undertaken. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of a leadup activity implemented as part of the scheduled laboratory course, when the amount of supervision provided to the experimental subjects during the entire course was reduced significantly, and when subjects were assigned randomly to the two conditions. Calibrated raters, blind to group affiliation of products, graded all preparations. Mean scores for the experimental group (n = 35) were superior to those of the control group (n = 29) for all five preparations, and were statistically significantly (p less than .05) higher on three. Self-evaluations were equivalent to rater evaluations for subjects in the experimental group but not for those in the control group. Self-reports suggest that students receiving leadup training used fewer teeth to practice each of the preparation styles. Anecdotal data indicate that instructors in the experimental group may have found their job no more difficult than it had been in the past. It is concluded that the leadup activity improves performance and increases efficiency as measured by the faculty-student ratio and amount of practice required by students.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Dental Education Association.