JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 57(8): 643-647 1993
© 1993 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peck, S
Right arrow Articles by Peck, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peck, S
Right arrow Articles by Peck, L
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 57, Issue 8, 643-647
Copyright © 1993 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

A time for change of tooth numbering systems

S Peck and L Peck

Tooth numbering provides dentists with an essential shortcut in clinical record-keeping. Today, three systems are favored worldwide: the Zsigmondy/Palmer system, the universal system, and the FDI two-digit system. Histories of these tooth numbering methods are traced, and the strengths and deficiencies of each are discussed. The FDI two-digit system-used throughout the world, but not in the USA-is the only method that makes visual sense, cognitive sense, and computer sense. It deserves consideration by American dentists as our official tooth numbering system.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Dental Education Association.