JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 59(11): 1034-1040 1995
© 1995 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plasschaert, A.
Right arrow Articles by Verdonschot, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plasschaert, A.
Right arrow Articles by Verdonschot, E.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 59, Issue 11, 1034-1040
Copyright © 1995 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Opinions and experiences of dental students and faculty concerning computer-assisted learning

AJ Plasschaert, NH Wilson, JG Cailleteau, and EH Verdonschot

This study assessed the opinions and attitudes of faculty and students concerning the use of computer-assisted learning (CAL) at three different dental schools on two continents (Manchester, U.K.; Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and Lexington, Kentucky, U.S.A.). In each school students and faculty received a questionnaire; faculty by internal mail, students at the end of a lecture. Response rates for students were 76 percent in Manchester, 64 percent in Nijmegen, and 91 percent in Lexington. The respective figures for faculty were: 42 percent, 47 percent, and 39 percent. In all three schools approximately 50 percent of students had a computer at home. Students in Lexington and Manchester seemed to be more advanced in the use of computers for self-instructional learning. Students and faculty in Lexington had more experience with interactive multimedia than did those in Manchester and Nijmegen. In general, Lexington students were somewhat more familiar with computers and CAL than Manchester students, with Nijmegen showing the lowest percentages. Few CAL programs were available at any school, with small numbers of dental students having been exposed to programs involving animation (vision, sound). The majority of students are of the opinion that the use of computers for learning is not impersonal, nor difficult, but challenging and motivating. There is good agreement that if a program is to be bought or developed, it should be a combination of text, images, and sound. It is postulated that concerted action by dental schools is required to realize the potential of CAL in dental education, and that international organizations should give consideration to coordinating this action.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
H. Rosenberg, J. Kermalli, E. Freeman, H. Tenenbaum, D. Locker, and H. Cohen
Effectiveness of an Electronic Histology Tutorial for First-Year Dental Students and Improvement in "Normalized" Test Scores
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2006; 70(12): 1339 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
L. D. Rajab and Z. H. Baqain
Use of Information and Communication Technology Among Dental Students at the University of Jordan
J Dent Educ., March 1, 2005; 69(3): 387 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
J. A. Buchanan
Experience with Virtual Reality-Based Technology in Teaching Restorative Dental Procedures
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2004; 68(12): 1258 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Dental Education Association.