JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 60(8): 693-700 1996
© 1996 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, J.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 60, Issue 8, 693-700
Copyright © 1996 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Potential effects of opportunity cost on dental school patients

JD Shulman

Predoctoral clinic fees are set below those of private practices to attract patients. Treatment in a predoctoral clinic requires more and longer appointments and patients spend more time waiting to be seen than in a private practice. This time has a value that economists call opportunity cost, the value of the next best alternative (the hourly wage for an employed patient). A model comparing total cost (fee plus opportunity cost) of treatment in dental schools and private practices for insured and uninsured patients is presented. As patient income increases, the total cost of some treatment plans becomes higher in dental schools than in private practices. To insured patients, however, the out-of-pocket cost of a treatment plan depends on copayments rather than fees. This makes predoctoral clinics less competitive. Considering opportunity cost further increases dental schools' lack of competitiveness. For insured patients, more treatment plans will have a lower total cost in private practice. Clinic directors must realize that if opportunity costs are not reduced, the market may dictate that fees be lowered to remain competitive with private practitioners. They are in competition for patients based on total cost, and efficiencies that reduce opportunity cost may increase revenue and attract patients.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Dental Education Association.