JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 60(9): 747-754 1996
© 1996 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glassman, P
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Glassman, P
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 60, Issue 9, 747-754
Copyright © 1996 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Program directors' opinions on the competency of postdoctoral general dentistry program graduates

P Glassman, S Redding, S Filler, and DW Chambers

Meeting the demand for postdoctoral general dentistry programs will require new, innovative, and flexible models. Many believe that these new models must be competency-based and focus on the outcomes of postdoctoral general dentistry training rather than on the structure and process of that training. The Section on Postdoctoral General Dentistry of the American Association of Dental Schools formed a broadly representative working group in the fall of 1994 to develop a set of competency and proficiency statements describing graduates of postdoctoral general dentistry programs. PGD program directors were then surveyed to determine the extent to which they felt these competencies matched their concepts of the PGD graduate. Between 44 and 65 competency statements that were rated highly by program directors could serve as the basis for a "core" set of statements to describe the abilities of graduates of postdoctoral general dentistry programs. These data should stimulate further discussion among educators, program directors, accrediting bodies, and government agencies about the future of postdoctoral general dentistry programs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
I. A. Razak, R. Latifah Rj, N. Jaafar, A. Hassan Mi, and N. Ab Murat
Assessing the Competency of University of Malaya Dental Graduates: Employers' and Graduates' Perceptions
J Dent Educ., March 1, 2008; 72(3): 364 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
F. W. Licari and D. W. Chambers
Some Paradoxes in Competency-Based Dental Education
J Dent Educ., January 1, 2008; 72(1): 8 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
N. S. SEALE and P. S. CASAMASSIMO
Access to dental care for children in the United States: A survey of general practitioners
J Am Dent Assoc, December 1, 2003; 134(12): 1630 - 1640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Dental Education Association.