JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 61(10): 795-803 1997
© 1997 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D.
Right arrow Articles by Geissberger, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D.
Right arrow Articles by Geissberger, M
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 61, Issue 10, 795-803
Copyright © 1997 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Toward a competency analysis of operative dentistry technique skills

DW Chambers and M Geissberger

This research seeks ways to distinguish beginners from competent students based on the manner in which they perform. Five "beginner" students who had passed preclinical operative dentistry technique and six "competent" students one month prior to graduation were videotaped performing an occlusal amalgam preparation on #19 on a typodont. The tapes were scored for time in cutting the preparation and observing it and for "unproductive work" (nonfluencies). The number of changes from one operation to another and the use of instruments as aids in measurement were also recorded. Three processes were identified in every student's performance: rough outline form, making walls parallel and cavosurfaces level, and refinement. All preparations were scored as being clinically acceptable and indistinguishable in quality between the two groups. Beginning students required over twice as long to complete the preparation and changed operations more than twice as often as their competent classmates. Most of these differences between groups occurred in the third, refinement, process. Compared to beginners, competent students showed more evidence of using powerful, internalized schema to guide their performance, were smoother, and seemed less rule-driven.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
F. W. Licari and D. W. Chambers
Some Paradoxes in Competency-Based Dental Education
J Dent Educ., January 1, 2008; 72(1): 8 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
K. E. Crespo, J. E. Torres, and M. E. Recio
Reasoning Process Characteristics in the Diagnostic Skills of Beginner, Competent, and Expert Dentists
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2004; 68(12): 1235 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Dental Education Association.