JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 61(5): 412-416 1997
© 1997 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, P.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 61, Issue 5, 412-416
Copyright © 1997 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Diversity and critical forces in dental education

PB Robertson

Critical issues that affect dental education and the connection between science and practice include the community, managed patient care, public skepticism and fiscal support, and shifting demography in patterns of oral disease as well as the background of students entering the dental profession. During the past several decades, there have been major shifts in the patterns of oral disease, most recently described in results of the NHANES III dental survey. The diversity and background of students entering the dental profession have changed dramatically as well, and present estimates of change in U.S. population are no less volatile. Funding for dental education in constant dollars is decreasing nationally, with declining support from state and federal sources and a much greater reliance on clinical and development income. Recent recommendations by the Institute of Medicine and Pew Health Commission and reactions to those recommendations by representative dental organizations-particularly the American Dental Association, American Association of Dental Schools, and the American Association of Dental Examiners-have significant implications for the structure of dental education. All of these factors are tempered by the emergence of managed patient care and the implications of that environment to increasing the level of academic excellence of students, improving the quality of care delivered to patients, and enhancing the scholarly contributions of faculty. These forces may represent an opportunity to maintain a well-documented national excellence in oral health care, expand the educational options to meet student demand and interest, increase the biological and behavioral background of our graduates, and explore new educational approaches to preclinical and clinical training.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Dental Education Association.