JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 62(11): 911-918 1998
© 1998 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graber, D.
Right arrow Articles by Javed, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Graber, D.
Right arrow Articles by Javed, T
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 62, Issue 11, 911-918
Copyright © 1998 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Academic deans' perceptions of current and ideal curriculum emphases

DR Graber, EH O'Neil, JP Bellack, C Musham, and T Javed

This study assessed the current and ideal for dental curriculum emphasis of thirty-three curriculum topic areas and evaluated barriers to curriculum change. A forty-six item survey was mailed to the academic deans of all U.S. dental schools with an 86 percent e response rate (n = 57). The means of their responses for current curricular emphasis and ideal emphasis on the thirty-three topic areas were compared. "Health promotion/disease prevention," "primary care," and "effective patient-provider relationships/communication" were the three topic areas rated most highly (for ideal emphasis) by the academic deans. "Case management," "outpatient/ambulatory care," and "continuous quality improvement" also received high mean scores for ideal emphasis. The most significant barrier to curriculum reform was "an already crowded curriculum." The academic deans reasserted the traditional emphasis in dentistry on primary care. There also appears to be considerable support for educational programs that will foster better patient relationships and greater quality assurance and control.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
S. A. Jessee, P. N. O'Neill, and R. O. Dosch
Matching student personality types and learning preferences to teaching methodologies.
J Dent Educ., June 1, 2006; 70(6): 644 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
D. Henzi, E. Davis, R. Jasinevicius, W. Hendricson, L. Cintron, and M. Isaacs
Appraisal of the Dental School Learning Environment: The Students' View
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2005; 69(10): 1137 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Dental Education Association.