JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 62(6): 409-414 1998
© 1998 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stacey, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stacey, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, C
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 62, Issue 6, 409-414
Copyright © 1998 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

The effect of clinical targets on productivity and perceptions of clinical competency

MA Stacey, MV Morgan, and C Wright

This study investigated the effect of clinical targets on clinical productivity and perceptions of clinical competency of final-year undergraduate dental students. Students were randomly divided into two equal groups. One group was set annual numerical clinical targets while the other had no targets. All final-year students and final-year clinical teachers were asked to complete a questionnaire rating six different aspects of student clinical competency at the end of semester 1 and semester 2. Changes in perception of clinical competency by students and clinical teachers were compared between the target and no-target groups and between students and clinical teachers. The clinical output of both groups was measured. There was no significant difference in performance between the target and no-target group as assessed by clinical teacher or by student self-assessment. However, by the completion of the study the clinical teachers scored the students (irrespective of group) significantly lower for clinical competency than students assessed themselves. There was no significant difference between the productivity of the two groups. The setting of clinical targets had no measurable effect on the perceived clinical competency or productivity of this group of undergraduate dental students.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
A. J. Formicola, R. Myers, J. F. Hasler, M. Peterson, W. Dodge, H. L. Bailit, T. J. Beazoglou, and L. A. Tedesco
Evolution of Dental School Clinics as Patient Care Delivery Centers
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2008; 72(2_suppl): 110 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
F. W. Licari and D. W. Chambers
Some Paradoxes in Competency-Based Dental Education
J Dent Educ., January 1, 2008; 72(1): 8 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
A. J. Formicola, R. Myers, J. F. Hasler, M. Peterson, W. Dodge, H. L. Bailit, T. Beazoglou, and L. A. Tedesco
Evolution of Dental School Clinics as Patient Care Delivery Centers
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2006; 70(12): 1271 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
R. G. Pousson and G. T. McDonald
A Model for Increasing Senior Dental Student Production Using Private Practice Principles
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2004; 68(12): 1272 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Dental Education Association.