JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 63(6): 459-463 1999
© 1999 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerrow, J.
Right arrow Articles by Boulais, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gerrow, J.
Right arrow Articles by Boulais, A.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 63, Issue 6, 459-463
Copyright © 1999 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Use of discriminant and regression analyses to modify a clinical certification board examination

JD Gerrow, MA Boyd, DA Scott, and AP Boulais

The National Dental Examining Board of Canada (NDEB) conducts mandatory, high stakes, pass/fail, certification examinations for dental licensure. One of these examinations was a seven-part, simulated clinical examination in which candidates were required to perform procedures on typodonts. These requirements were two intracoronal and two extracoronal preparations, an amalgam restoration, a provisional crown, and a diagnostic wax-up. Feedback from candidates and examiners indicated that one or more of the requirements may not have been contributing effectively to the overall evaluation of candidates. The NDEB's Clinical Examination Committee therefore requested that an in-depth statistical analysis be performed to identify potential areas of concern and to provide a basis for modifying the examinations. The results of two examination sessions with a total of 168 candidates were subjected to both a discriminant and a logistic regression analysis. Every candidate had results for each of the seven requirements, and no candidate participated in both sessions of the examination. The discriminant analysis revealed that six of the seven requirements could be used to reliably assign examinees according to their true pass/fail classifications. Stepwise discriminant analysis resulted in a 98.81 percent classification success rate with a corresponding 2.50 percent false-positive classification error rate. The logistic regression analysis showed that five components correctly predicted 99.40 percent with a 1.25 percent false-positive rate. The Clinical Examination Committee concluded that one requirement (diagnostic wax-up) should be eliminated and that a second requirement (PFM preparation) be significantly modified and reevaluated. This study demonstrates the usefulness of statistical methods in the analysis and modification of a clinical certification board examination.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
J. D. Gerrow, H. J. Murphy, and M. A. Boyd
Competencies for the beginning dental practitioner in Canada: a validity survey.
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2006; 70(10): 1076 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
J. D. Gerrow, H. J. Murphy, M. A. Boyd, and D. A. Scott
An analysis of the contribution of a patient-based component to a clinical licensure examination.
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2006; 137(10): 1434 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Dental Education Association.