JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 65(10): 1001-1006 2001
© 2001 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stookey, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez-Cabezas, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stookey, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez-Cabezas, C
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 65, Issue 10, 1001-1006
Copyright © 2001 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Emerging methods of caries diagnosis

GK Stookey and C Gonzalez-Cabezas

Current diagnostic tools used in dental caries detection are not sensitive enough to diagnose the disease process in its early stages and, frequently, once a diagnosis is made, restoration is the only effective means of treatment. The purpose of this review was to systematically assess the available literature for evidence to determine if emerging diagnostic methods for dental caries are more efficient than traditional methods for detecting and monitoring the progress of caries in permanent and primary teeth. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established preceding the literature search. Included articles were grouped by type of emerging technology and study design. The types of emerging technologies included laser fluorescence, light fluorescence, digital imaging fiber optic transillumination, and ultrasound. Primarily on the basis of in vitro and preclinical data, some of the reviewed methodologies showed promising results for the detection and monitoring of early caries lesions. However, very little clinical data are available to validate these emerging technologies. It was concluded that, although significant promise is apparent with these technologies, there is not enough evidence available at this time for any of the reviewed diagnostic techniques to be recommended as a substitute for traditional diagnostic techniques.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
J. D. BADER and D. A. SHUGARS
A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2004; 135(10): 1413 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
H. SPALLEK
A resource guide for practice development through technology
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2004; 135(suppl_1): 38S - 44S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
P.B. Imrey and A. Kingman
Analysis of Clinical Trials Involving Non-cavitated Caries Lesions
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C103 - C108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dental Education Association.