JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 65(10): 1024-1027 2001
© 2001 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burt, B.
Right arrow Articles by Pai, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burt, B.
Right arrow Articles by Pai, S
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 65, Issue 10, 1024-1027
Copyright © 2001 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Does low birthweight increase the risk of caries? A systematic review

BA Burt and S Pai

Low birthweight is a major public health and social problem in the United States. While a long list of mortality and morbidity conditions have been associated with low birthweight, dental conditions have not received much attention. This systematic review addresses this question: Do low-birthweight children (birthweight <2500 grams) subsequently develop more caries than do children with normal-to-high birthweight? The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for English-language papers published between January 1966 and July 2000 using a search expression developed in conjunction with an experienced librarian. There were 198 papers located in the initial search; a title and abstract review to identify clearly irrelevant papers reduced this number to 37. Two readers each read these papers, and application of predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria reduced this number to only four papers. Quality criteria were established for scoring each of these papers on evidence tables. The maximum score for each paper was 100; the four papers rated scored between 31 and 61. Results showed that no relationship between low birthweight and subsequent development of caries was reported in any of the four papers. However, conclusions must be cautious because of the scarcity of studies on the subject and the limited scope of the four papers judged. The relationship of low birthweight to subsequent development of caries, especially in the permanent dentition, needs further exploration.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. A. Hayden, P. Cote, and C. Bombardier
Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.
Ann Intern Med, March 21, 2006; 144(6): 427 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
C. Bedos, J.-M. Brodeur, S. Arpin, and B. Nicolau
Dental Caries Experience: A Two-generation Study
J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2005; 84(10): 931 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dental Education Association.