JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 65(10): 1154-1161 2001
© 2001 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McComb, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McComb, D
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 65, Issue 10, 1154-1161
Copyright © 2001 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Systematic review of conservative operative caries management strategies

D McComb

The relationship between cavity preparation extension and restoration longevity is examined through a systemic review of the available evidence on specific conservative, operative caries-management strategies. Evidence tables are provided for three specific techniques in the permanent dentition: 1) the proximal "tunnel" restoration, 2) the proximal "box-only" restoration, and 3) the preventive resin restoration. In the primary dentition, the clinical trials involving the proximal box-only restoration, most of which involved glass-ionomer materials, are reviewed. In the permanent dentition, the evidence reveals low effectiveness for "tunnel" restorations, limited but supportive results for proximal-only restorations, and generally favorable outcomes for the occlusal composite resin-sealant restoration. The weak link in the latter is the overlying fissure sealant, which requires adequate ongoing maintenance. Conservative operative strategies in the primary dentition have not been uniformly successful, and deleterious material effects dominate restoration performance. This systematic review concludes that operative conservatism per se does not guarantee increased restoration longevity and that all restorations are vulnerable to caries recurrence, material failures, and technical deficiencies. The more successful conservative strategies are expected to enhance tooth longevity, provided concomitant caries control is effective.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
N.R.F.A. Silva, R.M. Carvalho, L.F. Pegoraro, F.R. Tay, and V.P. Thompson
Evaluation of a Self-limiting Concept in Dentinal Caries Removal.
J. Dent. Res., March 1, 2006; 85(3): 282 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
J. BADER and A. ISMAIL
Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry
J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2004; 135(4): 464 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dental Education Association.