JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 65(11): 1243-1252 2001
© 2001 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 65, Issue 11, 1243-1252
Copyright © 2001 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Preliminary evidence for a general competency hypothesis

DW Chambers

Although predoctoral dental education is generally taught and evaluated by disciplines, there is no evidence bearing on whether the competencies necessary to begin independent practice are learned and practiced as a general set of skills, understanding, and values or as groups of discipline-specific skills, understanding, and values, which together constitute graduation competency. There is some support in the literature for each view In this preliminary investigation, 64,000 faculty ratings of student clinical competency were analyzed in a Year x Quarter x Discipline x Model design. The dependent variable was predictive validity of graduation quarter competency ratings using R-values from four prediction models. Results of a multiple repeated measures ANOVA show that models based on technical skills other than the one being predicted, clinical judgment and patient management, and the combination of these two models all predict graduation competency in each of four disciplines better than do ratings in the disciplines being predicted. As the time gap between predictive and predicted competence decreases, predictions become more accurate, but an asymptote is reached by the middle of the final clinical year. By using general models to evaluate students rather than discipline-specific ones, students needing intervention and remediation and those who could benefit from enrichment experiences can be identified as accurately at the beginning of their clinical careers as they can near the graduation deadline. This study provides preliminary support for a general competency hypothesis and suggests that research is necessary to better understand how students and dentists learn and practice rather than how they are taught.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
F. W. Licari and D. W. Chambers
Some Paradoxes in Competency-Based Dental Education
J Dent Educ., January 1, 2008; 72(1): 8 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
J. E. Milani, H. H. Chi, and D. W. Chambers
Comments as Part of a Clinical Competency Rating System
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2007; 71(2): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
D. L. Hall
Oral brush biopsy technique instruction outcomes for senior dental students.
J Dent Educ., August 1, 2006; 70(8): 820 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dental Education Association.