JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 66(11): 1260-1268 2002
© 2002 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jessee, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jessee, S.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 66, Issue 11, 1260-1268
Copyright © 2002 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

An evaluation of clinical mock boards and their influence on the success rate on qualifying boards

SA Jessee

An important responsibility of each dental school to its graduating dental students is exposure to and evaluation on a mock board that simulates one or more of the examinations given by its respective regional testing agencies. An introduction to the procedures and environment that will be encountered on a qualifying examination will hopefully increase a student's chance for success on such a test. The purpose of this study was to test the relationship of the various attributes or variables of mock boards given by dental schools in the United States and Puerto Rico with results obtained on the regional or state qualifying board(s) related to timing, structure, method of evaluation, graduation, and remediation. A twenty-item questionnaire was mailed to key clinical or curricular deans at fifty-four accredited dental schools. Ninety-three percent of schools completed and returned the questionnaire. In the sample of respondents, the percentages of schools participating in the various qualifying exams were: CRDTS = 22 percent; NERB = 42 percent; SRTA = 20 percent; WREB = 28 percent; Independents = 24 percent, with a reported overall passing rate (greater than or equal to 70) of 58 percent. The median time between the mock board and the qualifying board was 7.5 weeks. Results indicated that no single aspect of a mock board had a statistically significant effect on the outcome of qualifying examinations, resulting in a failure to reject the null hypothesis. Such findings may indicate that schools should focus their efforts on reassessing the restrictions and requirements imposed upon their students related to their mock board. A future study could include surveying recent graduates for their opinions of the value of their mock board experiences.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
E. F. Wright and D. Henzi
Preparation Course for Part I of the National Dental Boards: Lessons Learned
J Dent Educ., June 1, 2007; 71(6): 785 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
R. R. Ranney, J. C. Gunsolley, and M. Wood
Authors' response
J Am Dent Assoc, December 1, 2004; 135(12): 1661 - 1662.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
C. M. Stewart, F. J. Vertucci, and R. E. Bates
Improving Performance on the Endodontic Section of the Florida Dental Licensure Examination
J Dent Educ., August 1, 2004; 68(8): 829 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dental Education Association.