JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 66(4): 541-547 2002
© 2002 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leggott, P.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leggott, P.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 66, Issue 4, 541-547
Copyright © 2002 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Patterns of oral care in dental school and general dental practice

PJ Leggott, PB Robertson, M del Aguila, JJ Swift, D Porterfield, S Phillips, and MH Anderson

This study compared patterns of oral care provided by predoctoral dental students for patients seeking treatment at the University of Washington (UW) with patterns reported for general dental offices by the Washington Dental Service (WDS). Dental care included about 5 million services provided to 880,317 patients by 2,803 WDS general dentists and about 45,600 dental services provided to 9,488 patients by 155 UW dental students during 1999. There was high fidelity between databases and randomly surveyed patient records for treatment provided in both UW (95 percent) and WDS (97 percent) populations. While patient age patterns were generally similar, UW students completed more procedures for young children and for adults older than seventy-four years but completed fewer procedures for age groups of from thirteen to eighteen and from forty-five to fifty-four than general dental offices. The relative mix of all services completed by UW and WDS providers was similar (ANOVA, P=0.82). Within categories of service, the percentage of total services completed by students compared to those submitted by community dentists to WDS was about the same for examinations, radiographs, fluoride and sealants, amalgams, composites, single crowns, and endodontics. The percentage of total procedures completed showed a greater emphasis by UW students on inlays/onlays, dentures, extractions, and periodontal maintenance, and lesser experience with implants, orthodontics, sedation, and emergency procedures than general dental offices. We conclude that the relative distribution of clinical services provided by UW dental students is comparable to those procedures reported to WDS by dental offices in the adjacent community.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
C. E. Janus, J. W. Unger, and A. M. Best
Survival Analysis of Complete Veneer Crowns vs. Multisurface Restorations: A Dental School Patient Population.
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2006; 70(10): 1098 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
V. C. Petropoulos, N. S. Arbree, D. Tarnow, M. Rethman, J. Malmquist, R. Valachovic, W. D. Brunson, and M. C. Alfano
Teaching Implant Dentistry in the Predoctoral Curriculum: A Report from the ADEA Implant Workshop's Survey of Deans
J Dent Educ., May 1, 2006; 70(5): 580 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
E. Solomon, J. Murray, W. W. Dodge, S. W. Redding, J. A. Valenza, C. M. Flaitz, J. S. Cole, and K. L. Kalkwarf
Scope of practice comparison: a tool for curriculum decision making.
J Dent Educ., March 1, 2006; 70(3): 231 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dental Education Association.