|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Although it is important to assess the effectiveness of programs, courses, and teaching methods to ensure that goals are being achieved, it is very difficult to evaluate the impact of fundamental changes in a whole curriculum. This paper reviews measures that have been used in the past in dentistry and medicine for evaluating academic programs: curriculum guidelines; competency documents; discussion and focus groups; competency examinations; board examinations; oral comprehensive examinations; student, alumni, and patient satisfaction surveys; evaluation by instructors; and clinical productivity. We conclude that, since no standard method exists, several tools should be used to obtain a multidimensional assessment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Arena, E. Kruger, D. Holley, S. Millar, and M. Tennant Western Australian Dental Graduates' Perception of Preparedness to Practice: A Five-Year Follow-Up J Dent Educ., September 1, 2007; 71(9): 1217 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Gerrow, H. J. Murphy, and M. A. Boyd Competencies for the beginning dental practitioner in Canada: a validity survey. J Dent Educ., October 1, 2006; 70(10): 1076 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Z. Victoroff and S. Hogan Students' perceptions of effective learning experiences in dental school: a qualitative study using a critical incident technique. J Dent Educ., February 1, 2006; 70(2): 124 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |