JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 67(12): 1355-1361 2003
© 2003 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roccia, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cuddy, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roccia, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cuddy, M.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 67, Issue 12, 1355-1361
Copyright © 2003 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Automated external defibrillator use among the general population

WD Roccia, PE Modic, and MA Cuddy

Automated External Defibrillators (AED) are becoming more prominent in public locations within the mainstream of our society. They are marketed as providing the ability for a broader range of people, beyond clinicians and community emergency medical services personal, to successfully defibrillate a person in cardiac arrest. The objectives of this study were to determine whether or not a member of the general population, without previous exposure to an AED, could successfully operate an AED, thus delivering the necessary shock in ventricular fibrillation arrest. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between health care training and the time required to defibrillate a patient using an AED and investigated the overall success of operating an AED with respect to health care training. Utilizing an AED trainer, we conducted a timed trial study of five subject categories (general population; first-year dental students; third-year dental students; dentists, hygienists, and nurses; and anesthesiologists and surgeons) as each operator attempted to defibrillate a mannequin (n=50). Their times, success in defibrillation, and comments were recorded. The general population group experienced an 80 percent failure rate, while the other groups showed an inverse relationship between failure rates and the amount of health care training. Overall, only 58 percent of the subjects successfully performed the defibrillation with the AED. Operator speed in relation to the amount of health care training showed another inverse relationship as times decreased from group one (general population) to group five (anesthesiologists and surgeons). The findings suggest that prior exposure to an AED leads to a greater number of successful defibrillations. It remains unclear at this time as to whether a member of the general population can successfully operate an AED.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
D. P. Kandray, J. A. Pieren, and R. W. Benner
Attitudes of Ohio Dentists and Dental Hygienists on the Use of Automated External Defibrillators
J Dent Educ., April 1, 2007; 71(4): 480 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 8: Interdisciplinary Topics
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-100 - III-108.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dental Education Association.