|
|
||||||||
Articles |
This project was undertaken to compare the opinions of private and public dental school students' perceptions concerning extramural programming, which is defined as any aspect of the curriculum in which undergraduate dental students provide dental care outside the main dental facility. A survey instrument was used to collect data from undergraduate students at a private (N = 267; 88.4 percent response rate) and at a public (N = 213; 67.2 percent response rate) dental school. When asked to rate the value of various extramural sites in making them a better dentist, both groups rated private dental offices the most valuable and prisons the least valuable. When questioned about the amount of time students should spend each year in extramural programming, private students, overall, desired 34 percent more time than did public students. When asked what percentage of the total time spent in extramural programming students should spend providing various categories of dental care, public school students thought 26 percent more time should be spent rendering preventive services/health education than did the private students. The private students indicated a stronger desire (13 percent more) for rendering clinical services than did public students. Both private and public students were most likely to enter group private practice after graduation. The increasing interest in community-based programs makes the information gained from this study useful for future curriculum planning.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Chapper, S. A. Campani, V. d. S. Paiva, C. de A. de Assis, E. Garcia, and F. A. A. e Silva Comparison of Student Satisfaction in Public Versus Private Dental Schools in Brazil J Dent Educ., October 1, 2007; 71(10): 1363 - 1369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Johnson, P. M. Loomer, S. C. Siegel, E. S. Pilcher, J. E. Leigh, M. J. Gillespie, R. K. Simmons, and S. P. Turner Strategic partnerships between academic dental institutions and communities: Addressing disparities in oral health care J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2007; 138(10): 1366 - 1371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Kuthy, K. E. Heller, K. J. Riniker, M. R. McQuistan, and F. Qian Students' Opinions About Treating Vulnerable Populations Immediately After Completing Community-Based Clinical Experiences J Dent Educ., May 1, 2007; 71(5): 646 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bernabe, J. B. Bernal, and R. J. Beltran-Neira A model of dental public health teaching at the undergraduate level in peru. J Dent Educ., August 1, 2006; 70(8): 875 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Kuthy, M. R. McQuistan, K. J. Riniker, K. E. Heller, and F. Qian Students' Comfort Level in Treating Vulnerable Populations and Future Willingness to Treat: Results Prior to Extramural Participation J Dent Educ., December 1, 2005; 69(12): 1307 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Henzi, E. Davis, R. Jasinevicius, W. Hendricson, L. Cintron, and M. Isaacs Appraisal of the Dental School Learning Environment: The Students' View J Dent Educ., October 1, 2005; 69(10): 1137 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |