JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 67(9): 991-1002 2003
© 2003 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gadbury-Amyot, C.
Right arrow Articles by Overman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gadbury-Amyot, C.
Right arrow Articles by Overman, P.
Journal of Dental Education, Vol 67, Issue 9, 991-1002
Copyright © 2003 by American Dental Education Association


Articles

Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment of competency in a baccalaureate dental hygiene program

CC Gadbury-Amyot, J Kim, RL Palm, GE Mills, E Noble, and PR Overman

This study examined the validity and reliability of portfolio assessment using Messick's unified framework of construct validity. Theoretical and empirical evidence was sought for six aspects of construct validity. Seven faculty raters evaluated twenty student portfolios using a primary trait analysis scoring rubric. A significant relationship (r = .81-.95; p < .01) between the seven subscales in the scoring rubric demonstrates measurement of a common construct. There was a significant relationship between portfolios and GPA (r = .70; p < .01) and the NBDHE (r = .60; p < .01). The relationship between portfolios and the Central Regional Dental Testing Service (CRDTS) examination was both weak and nonsignificant (r = .19; p > .05). A fully crossed, two-facet generalizability (G) study design was used to examine reliability. ANOVA demonstrated that the greatest source of variance was the scoring rubric itself, accounting for 78 percent of the total variance. The smallest source of variance was the interaction between portfolio and rubric (1.15 percent). Faculty rater variance accounted for only 1.28 percent of total variance. A phi coefficient of .86, analogous to a reliability coefficient in classical test theory, was obtained in the decision study by increasing the subscales to fourteen and decreasing faculty raters to three. In conclusion, the pattern of findings from this study suggests that portfolios can serve as a valid and reliable measure for assessing student competency.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
F. W. Licari and D. W. Chambers
Some Paradoxes in Competency-Based Dental Education
J Dent Educ., January 1, 2008; 72(1): 8 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
C. Christie, D. Bowen, and C. Paarmann
Effectiveness of Faculty Training to Enhance Clinical Evaluation of Student Competence in Ethical Reasoning and Professionalism
J Dent Educ., August 1, 2007; 71(8): 1048 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
R. R. Ranney and R. Hambleton
Author's response
J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2006; 137(5): 590 - 591.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
D. Hammond, C. W. Buckendahl, R. R. Ranney, and R. Hambleton
Do portfolio assessments have a place in dental licensure?
J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2006; 137(1): 30 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
C. C. Gadbury-Amyot, K. K. Bray, B. S. Branson, L. Holt, N. Keselyak, T. V. Mitchell, and K. B. Williams
Predictive Validity of Dental Hygiene Competency Assessment Measures on One-Shot Clinical Licensure Examinations
J Dent Educ., March 1, 2005; 69(3): 363 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dental Education Association.