JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 68(8): 859-866 2004
© 2004 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bogert, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bogert, M. C.

Educational Methodologies

Student Learning Preferences and Teaching Implications

Robert J. Murphy, M.B.A.; Sarah A. Gray, D.D.S., M.S.; Sorin R. Straja, Ph.D.; Meredith C. Bogert, D.M.D.

Key words: learning preference, VARK, adult learning

Submitted for publication 03/11/04; accepted 05/26/04


One of the most serious challenges that dental educators face today is improving the level of student satisfaction with the curriculum and learning environment. To determine whether a particular teaching method might enhance student satisfaction with the learning process, a learning preference survey linked to sensory modalities was given to students in the four classes of the Temple University School of Dentistry. New Zealand educator Neil Fleming developed the survey called VARK (an acronym for Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic) in 1998. The purpose of this study was to measure the distribution of learning preference mean scores of the dental students and note any significant differences among classes, gender, and a sample population determined using 31,243 participants on the VARK website. Results clearly demonstrate that the dominant preference distributions for the two populations (dental student and sample population) are different. In particular, the proportions of learners who selected visual or kinesthetic are significantly different for the two populations, while the proportions of learners who selected aural or read/write are not significantly different. Dental students prefer visual learning at a higher percentage and kinesthetic learning at a lower percentage than the sample population measured in the VARK website. Inter-class differences varied, and gender differences were not significant. The distribution of dental student scores shows a preference for instructors who use strong visual presentations and facilitate note-taking during lectures. Dental educators should be aware of these differences in order to explore opportunities for making the educational experience more productive and enjoyable.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
S. Wu, D. Miao, X. Zhu, Z. Luo, and X. Liu
Personality Types of Chinese Dental School Applicants
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2007; 71(12): 1593 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
J. A. Slater, H. L. Lujan, and S. E. DiCarlo
Does gender influence learning style preferences of first-year medical students?
Advan Physiol Educ, December 1, 2007; 31(4): 336 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
Z. Baykan and M. Nacar
Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey
Advan Physiol Educ, June 1, 2007; 31(2): 158 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
W. Hendricson, E. Eisenberg, G. Guest, P. Jones, L. Johnson, F. Panagakos, J. McDonald, and L. Cintron
What Do Dental Students Think About Mandatory Laptop Programs?
J Dent Educ., May 1, 2006; 70(5): 480 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
K. G. Boberick
Creating a Web-Enhanced Interactive Preclinic Technique Manual: Case Report and Student Response
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2004; 68(12): 1245 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Dental Education Association.