JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 69(4): 414-418 2005
© 2005 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Naylor, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tang, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Naylor, A. E.

From the Students' Corner

Single-Unit Implants Versus Conventional Treatments for Compromised Teeth: A Brief Review of the Evidence

Clarence S. Tang, B.A.; Adam E. Naylor, B.S.

Mr. Tang and Mr. Naylor are both Predoctoral Students, Class of 2006, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry. Direct correspondence and requests for reprints to Mr. Clarence Tang, University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, Student Mailboxes 006-065, CB #7450, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450; 919-321-0239 phone; 919-966-5795 fax; tangcs{at}email.unc.edu.

Key words: dental implants, implant-supported dental prosthesis, single-tooth implants, endodontics, periodontics

Submitted for publication 12/09/04; accepted 01/28/05


The goal of preserving the natural dentition has long provided the foundation for clinical decision making in dentistry. Current trends in implant dentistry have weakened this paradigm as many practitioners have moved quickly to adopt implant dentistry as a new standard of care; however, the rapidity of this shift is a cause for concern among others. Many short-term studies have reported favorable data supporting the growth of single-unit implant dentistry, but the lack of standardized outcome evaluations and broadly conceived dimensions of performance makes it difficult to compare these reports. Thus, even with the exciting new treatment options implant dentistry offers patients and practitioners, all due consideration should first be given to treatments aimed at preserving and restoring compromised teeth before pursuing extraction and replacement. This article examines this premise from five perspectives: form, function, survival, management of complications, and quality of life.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
J. A. Horst
Bootstrapping Student Publication in the JDE: An ADEA Council of Students Initiative
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2007; 71(10): 1265 - 1266.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dental Education Association.