JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Dent Educ. 69(8): 864-869 2005
© 2005 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. E.

Critical Issues in Dental Education

Relationship Between Performance in Dental School and Performance on a Dental Licensure Examination: An Eight-Year Study

Carol M. Stewart, D.D.S., M.S.; Robert E. Bates, Jr., D.D.S., M.S.; Gregory E. Smith, D.D.S., M.S.D.

Key words: dental licensure exam, exam performance predictors, academic ranking

Submitted for publication 03/14/05; accepted 04/25/05

This study assessed relationships between academic performance in dental school and "first attempt" performance on a state dental licensure examination for 1996–2003 graduates from the University of Florida College of Dentistry (UFCD). The 524 graduates were ranked into quartiles based on graduating GPA. Using analysis of variance (ANOVA), the students’ mean exam score (or exam section score) for each respective quartile (n=131) was compared with mean score for graduates in the combined four quartiles (n=524). ANOVA assessments, by quartile, were performed for the following six measures: 1) overall composite score on the dental licensure exam, 2) clinical periodontics section, 3) clinical amalgam section, 4) combination of clinical periodontics and clinical amalgam, 5) laboratory (manikin exam) with a written prosthodontic exam, and 6) manikin exam without the prosthodontic exam. For the overall exam and all exam sections, a significant (p<0.001) relationship was found between higher mean exam scores and academic ranking in quartile 1. A significant relationship was found between performance (lower mean scores) and ranking in quartile 4 for all exam sections, with the exception of the clinical periodontal section. The results of this study indicate a correlation between performance in dental school and performance on the Florida dental licensure exam for 1996–2003 UFCD graduates.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
D. C. Holmes, J. V. Doering, and M. Spector
Associations Among Predental Credentials and Measures of Dental School Achievement
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2008; 72(2): 142 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
J. D. Gerrow, H. J. Murphy, M. A. Boyd, and D. A. Scott
An analysis of the contribution of a patient-based component to a clinical licensure examination.
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2006; 137(10): 1434 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
D. Hammond, C. W. Buckendahl, R. R. Ranney, and R. Hambleton
Do portfolio assessments have a place in dental licensure?
J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2006; 137(1): 30 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Dental Education Association.