J Dent Educ. 70(11): 1146-1151 2006
© 2006 American Dental Education Association
Professional Promises: Hopes and Gaps in Access to Oral Health Care |
Access Denied; Invalid Password
David W. Chambers, Ed.M., M.B.A., Ph.D.
Key words: ethics, community, rhetoric, access, care
Progress addressing access to oral health is difficult to evaluate because it is unclear what access means. Ozars proposal that access should be defined by dentists as true dental need is criticized. It is proposed that four different types of treatment are currently identifiable in dentistry: 1) traditional oral health care, 2) oral care that has minimal or no health component, 3) episodic care, and 4) oral health outcomes not resulting from dentist interventions such as fluoridation. Each of these models has a different definition of care and of access. The profession is becoming segmentedincluding growing disparities among dentists in earning potentialto the point where a single model may no longer be able to cover all needs for oral health.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Patthoff
The Need for Dental Ethicists and the Promise of Universal Patient Acceptance: Response to Richard Masella's "Renewing Professionalism in Dental Education"
J Dent Educ.,
February 1, 2007;
71(2):
222 - 226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dental Education Association.