JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Dent Educ. 70(3): 292-295 2006
© 2006 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nainar, S.M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Straffon, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nainar, S.M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Straffon, L. H.

Educational Methodologies

Predoctoral Dental Student Evaluation of American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry’s Caries-Risk Assessment Tool

S.M. Hashim Nainar, B.D.S., M.D.Sc.; Lloyd H. Straffon, D.D.S., M.S.

Key words: dental education, pediatric dentistry, dental caries susceptibility

Submitted for publication 08/08/05; accepted 10/21/05

The purpose of this study was to determine predoctoral dental student evaluation of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry’s Caries-Risk Assessment Tool (CAT) for children. Dental students were introduced to the CAT instrument as part of their didactic pediatric dentistry curriculum. These students were later encouraged to use the CAT instrument for determining caries risk in their pediatric patients. Following a two-year exposure to the CAT instrument, dental students completed an anonymous seven-item evaluation of the instrument at the end of their primary clinical experience in pediatric dentistry. The students were asked to score each item on a five-point scale ranging from strongly agree (#5) to neutral (#3) to strongly disagree (#1). Ninety-seven percent of eligible students completed the CAT evaluation questionnaire. Most students agreed that the CAT instrument was easy to understand (86 percent), simple to apply (76 percent), useful for prescribing radiographs (76 percent), and useful for determining preventive procedures (84 percent). Eighty percent of them indicated that they were likely to use the CAT instrument in their clinical practice. In conclusion, student acceptance of the CAT instrument indicates that it may educate predoctoral dental students regarding caries risk assessment in children.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
C. D. Gonzalez and C. Okunseri
Senior Dental Students' Experience with Cariogram in a Pediatric Dentistry Clinic
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2010; 74(2): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
S. H. Calderon, P. Gilbert, R. N. Zeff, S. A. Gansky, J. D.B. Featherstone, J. A. Weintraub, and B. Gerbert
Dental Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Intended Behaviors Regarding Caries Risk Assessment: Impact of Years of Education and Patient Age
J Dent Educ., November 1, 2007; 71(11): 1420 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dental Education Association.