JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Dent Educ. 70(4): 361-377 2006
© 2006 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henzi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hendricson, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henzi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hendricson, W.

Educational Methodologies

North American Dental Students’ Perspectives About Their Clinical Education

David Henzi, Ed.D.; Elaine Davis, Ph.D.; Roma Jasinevicius, D.D.S., M.Ed.; William Hendricson, M.S., M.A.

Key words: clinical education, dental students, instructional effectiveness, dental education, teacher evaluation

Submitted for publication 10/05/05; accepted 12/06/05

Many North American dental schools face the challenge of replacing the majority of their "boomer generation" clinical instructors over the next ten years as this cohort of faculty reaches retirement age. Developing a new cadre of clinical instructors poses a substantial faculty development challenge: what instructional techniques should be integrated into routine educational practice by the dental faculty of the future, and what aspects of the clinical learning environment should be addressed to improve the overall quality of the experience for patients, students, and the new cohort of instructors? To gain insight that might guide faculty development for new clinical instructors and enhance understanding of the learning environment in dental school clinics, this study addressed the following question: what are dental students’ perceptions of their learning experiences in the clinical setting? The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the clinical instruction from the perspectives of the actual "consumer" of dental education: the student. This consumers’ perspective was provided by 655 junior, senior, and graduate dental students at twenty-one North American dental schools who completed the Clinical Education Instructional Quality Questionnaire (ClinEd IQ) in 2003–04. The ClinED IQ examines four components of students’ clinical experiences: 1) clinical learning opportunities, 2) involvement in specific learning activities, 3) interaction with clinical instructors, and 4) personal perceptions about clinical education. With the exception of inconsistent feedback and instruction and lack of continuous contact with the same instructors, juniors, seniors, and graduate students rated their interaction with clinical instructors favorably (mean=4.76 on a 6.00 scale), but provided lower ratings for clinical learning opportunities (mean=4.26 on a 6.00 scale) due to concerns about the efficiency of the dental clinic environment and lack of opportunity to treat patients in a variety of clinical settings. Analysis of more than 1,000 written comments provided by these students indicated four areas of concern: 1) inconsistent and sometimes insensitive (patronizing, rude) feedback from faculty; 2) excessive amounts of noneducational "legwork" such as billing, patient scheduling, phone calling, completing paperwork, and performing other clinic operations tasks; 3) limited access to faculty because of insufficient numbers of instructors on the clinic floor or difficulty locating faculty when they were needed for coaching, work evaluation, and chart signatures; and 4) concerns about the strategies employed to meet procedural requirements that some students saw as ethically questionable. Junior, senior, and graduate dental students at twenty-one North American dental schools perceived that the strongest aspect of their clinical education was their relationship with the faculty, but also reported that the dental school clinic was often an inefficient learning environment that hindered their opportunity to develop clinical competency. Students also sensed that faculty shortages, a growing crisis for dental education, hindered their progress in the clinic and made learning less efficient.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
R. L. Sakaguchi
Facilitating Preceptor and Student Communication in a Dental School Teaching Clinic
J Dent Educ., January 1, 2010; 74(1): 36 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
E. Bimstein, A. F. Azari, J. J. Sotto, and J. L. Riley III
Students' Perceptions About Pediatric Dental Behavior Guidance in an Undergraduate Four-Year Dental Curriculum
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2009; 73(12): 1366 - 1371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
N. K. Haden, W. D. Hendricson, J. W. Killip, P. N. O'Neill, M. J. Reed, G. Weinstein, J. N. Williams, and R. W. Valachovic
Developing dental faculty for the future: ADEA/AAL Institute for Teaching and Learning, 2006-09.
J Dent Educ., November 1, 2009; 73(11): 1320 - 1335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
A. Obrez, D. J. Lee, A. Organ-Boshes, J. C.-C. Yuan, and G. W. Knight
A Clinically Oriented Complete Denture Program for Second-Year Dental Students
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2009; 73(10): 1194 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
T. T. Le, E. L. Scheller, H. M. Pinsky, S. J. Stefanac, and R. S. Taichman
Ability of Dental Students to Deliver Oxygen in a Medical Emergency
J Dent Educ., April 1, 2009; 73(4): 499 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
K. V. Garland and K. J. Newell
Dental Hygiene Faculty Calibration in the Evaluation of Calculus Detection
J Dent Educ., March 1, 2009; 73(3): 383 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
W. D. Hendricson
The ADEA CCI Series of Articles: Perspectives and Reflections in Dental Education (PRIDE)
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2009; 73(2): 160 - 165.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
H.-T. C. Lam, T. Ward, T. G. O'Toole, P. E. Arola, and B. K. Chang
Impact of Infrastructure on Graduate Dental Education and Dental Clinic Productivity
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2009; 73(2): 184 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
J. E.N. Albino, S. K. Young, L. M. Neumann, G. A. Kramer, S. C. Andrieu, L. Henson, B. Horn, and W. D. Hendricson
Assessing Dental Students' Competence: Best Practice Recommendations in the Performance Assessment Literature and Investigation of Current Practices in Predoctoral Dental Education
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2008; 72(12): 1405 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
J. P. Connor and K. Troendle
Perspectives on the Dental School Learning Environment: Putting Theory X and Theory Y into Action in Dental Education
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2008; 72(12): 1436 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
A. Nimmo, G. S. Mitchell, L. Echeto, and A. K. Ojha
Effect of Dental Students as Instructors on Preclinical Performance in Prosthodontics
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2008; 72(12): 1488 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
L. Jahangiri and M. Choi
A Model for an Integrated Predoctoral Implant Curriculum: Implementation and Outcomes
J Dent Educ., November 1, 2008; 72(11): 1304 - 1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
L. Jahangiri, T. W. Mucciolo, M. Choi, and A. I. Spielman
Assessment of Teaching Effectiveness in U.S. Dental Schools and the Value of Triangulation
J Dent Educ., June 1, 2008; 72(6): 707 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
W. R. Cardall, R. C. Rowan, and C. Bay
Dental Education from the Students' Perspective: Curriculum and Climate
J Dent Educ., May 1, 2008; 72(5): 600 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
K. FitzGerald, N. S. Seale, C. A. Kerins, R. McElvaney, and E. Fitzgerald
The Critical Incident Technique and Pediatric Dentistry: A Worked Example
J Dent Educ., March 1, 2008; 72(3): 305 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
H. L. Bailit
The Fundamental Financial Problems of Dental Education and Their Impact on Education, Operations, Scholarship, and Patient Care
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2008; 72(2_suppl): 14 - 17.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
Implications of Moving to a Patient-Centered Model in Clinical Dental Education: Reactions to "Financing Dental Education: The Findings of the Macy Study"
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2008; 72(2_suppl): 25 - 27.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
A. J. Formicola, R. Myers, J. F. Hasler, M. Peterson, W. Dodge, H. L. Bailit, T. J. Beazoglou, and L. A. Tedesco
Evolution of Dental School Clinics as Patient Care Delivery Centers
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2008; 72(2_suppl): 110 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
W. D. Hendricson, E. Anderson, S. C. Andrieu, D. G. Chadwick, J. R. Cole, M. C. George, G. N. Glickman, J. F. Glover, J. S. Goldberg, N. K. Haden, et al.
Does Faculty Development Enhance Teaching Effectiveness?
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2007; 71(12): 1513 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
H. Karibe, A. Suzuki, T. Sekimoto, M.L. T. Srithavaj, A. Iamaroon, S. Warita, T. Kawakami, K. Ogata, T. Shirase, and S. Nakahara
Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Attitudes of Dental Students in Three Countries
J Dent Educ., November 1, 2007; 71(11): 1457 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
J. A. Horst
Bootstrapping Student Publication in the JDE: An ADEA Council of Students Initiative
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2007; 71(10): 1265 - 1266.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
A. Chapper, S. A. Campani, V. d. S. Paiva, C. de A. de Assis, E. Garcia, and F. A. A. e Silva
Comparison of Student Satisfaction in Public Versus Private Dental Schools in Brazil
J Dent Educ., October 1, 2007; 71(10): 1363 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
G. Arena, E. Kruger, D. Holley, S. Millar, and M. Tennant
Western Australian Dental Graduates' Perception of Preparedness to Practice: A Five-Year Follow-Up
J Dent Educ., September 1, 2007; 71(9): 1217 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
C.-A. Trotman, N. K. Haden, and W. Hendricson
Does the Dental School Work Environment Promote Successful Academic Careers?
J Dent Educ., June 1, 2007; 71(6): 713 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
D. Henzi, E. Davis, R. Jasinevicius, and W. Hendricson
In the Students' Own Words: What Are the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Dental School Curriculum?
J Dent Educ., May 1, 2007; 71(5): 632 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
A. J. Formicola, R. Myers, J. F. Hasler, M. Peterson, W. Dodge, H. L. Bailit, T. Beazoglou, and L. A. Tedesco
Evolution of Dental School Clinics as Patient Care Delivery Centers
J Dent Educ., December 1, 2006; 70(12): 1271 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dental Education Association.