JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Dent Educ. 70(8): 869-874 2006
© 2006 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leles, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leles, C. R.

International Dental Education

Critical Appraisal and Positive Outcome Bias in Case Reports Published in Brazilian Dental Journals

Geraldo J. Oliveira, D.D.S., M.Sc.; Cláudio R. Leles, D.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D.

Key words: publication, publication bias, case report

Submitted for publication 01/11/06; accepted 04/25/06

The aim of this study was to carry out a critical appraisal to detect the occurrence of publication bias, specifically positive-outcome bias, in Brazilian dental journals. A convenience sample of twenty-eight dental journals published in Brazil between 1994 and 2003 was selected (564 issues containing 5,453 articles). Each article was classified according to methodological design; 1,064 were classified as case reports. A simple random sample of 435 articles comprised the final study sample and was submitted to a critical appraisal by previously trained raters. Although a great part of case reports achieve proper structural aspects, most authors did not consider important aspects that could help the decision making process, such as discussion of alternative approaches, limitation of the performed procedures, lack of long-term clinical follow-up, possible variations in treatment outcome, and failure to discuss limitations of study design. In addition, unanimous reports of successful outcomes of clinical interventions strongly suggest that publication of case reports was influenced by positive outcome bias, which may influence readers’ clinical decision making process.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Dental Education Association.