JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 71(12): 1561-1573 2007
© 2007 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalrymple, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shuler, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalrymple, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shuler, C. F.

Educational Methodologies

PBL Core Skills Faculty Development Workshop 3: Understanding PBL Process Assessment and Feedback via Scenario-Based Discussions, Observation, and Role-Play

Kirsten R. Dalrymple, Ph.D.; Shirley Wong, D.D.S.; Alvin Rosenblum, D.D.S.; Carol Wuenschell, Ph.D.; Michael Paine, D.D.S., Ph.D.; Charles F. Shuler, D.M.D., Ph.D.

Key words: problem-based learning, assessment, feedback, facilitator, faculty development

Submitted for publication 05/04/07; accepted 09/14/07


Tutorial assessment in PBL is thought to be a valid assessment approach and is believed to exert a positive impact on the learning process. Reports, however, have demonstrated that assessment by the facilitator can be unreliable. Training of faculty to conduct this type of assessment has tended to be lacking and is a likely contributor to this inconsistency. This report describes the final in a series of foundation-building faculty development workshops focused on the instructional methodology of PBL. The PBL Assessment and Feedback workshop reported here introduced the theory and practice of conducting process-based assessment accompanied by formative feedback. Scenario-based discussions, mock group demonstration, role-modeling, and role-play were utilized as adult learning-appropriate strategies to familiarize participants with process-based assessment and feedback. Evaluation of the workshop by participants provided evidence that the majority of participants were satisfied with the methods and content of the workshop. Suggestions for additional training in these assessment methods included additional examples, practice, workshops, or observation and mentoring.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
D. C. Johnsen, M. W. Finkelstein, T. A. Marshall, and Y. M. Chalkley
A Model for Critical Thinking Measurement of Dental Student Performance
J Dent Educ., February 1, 2009; 73(2): 177 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dental Education Association.