JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Dent Educ. 71(2): 296-303 2007
© 2007 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linnebur, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Astroth, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linnebur, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Astroth, J. D.

Milieu in Dental School and Practice

Educational Practices Regarding Anticoagulation and Dental Procedures in U.S. Dental Schools

Sunny A. Linnebur, Pharm.D.; Samuel L. Ellis, Pharm.D.; Jeffrey D. Astroth, D.D.S., M.S.P.H.

Key words: dentistry, dentists, education, school dentistry, dental education, dental continuing education, anticoagulants, hemorrhage

Submitted for publication 07/06/06; accepted 09/21/06

Evidence suggests that stopping oral anticoagulation with warfarin is not necessary in patients requiring low-risk dental procedures and may actually increase thrombosis risk. However, widespread belief remains among dentists that stopping oral anticoagulation for dental procedures is necessary. The purpose of this study was to investigate the teaching practice of U.S. dental faculty responsible for providing education to dental students about anticoagulation. Surveys were mailed in 2003 and 2004 to fifty-five U.S. dental faculties to assess their teaching practice regarding anticoagulation and dental procedures. Twenty-eight (50.9 percent) of the schools returned surveys. Contrary to evidence indicating anticoagulation does not need to be altered, many dental faculty responded that they teach dental students to discuss with medical providers/patients about altering warfarin therapy for several routine procedures: 21.4 percent (cleaning), 14.3 percent (restorative treatment), 46.4 percent (single simple extraction), 64.3 percent (multiple simple extractions), and 17.9 percent (root canal). However, 67.9 percent stated an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 2.0–3.0 would be acceptable prior to dental procedures. A discrepancy was also found between the number of faculty recommending altering warfarin in intermediate- to high-risk individuals compared to those recommending heparin bridging for the same patients. Overall, this study identified inconsistencies between teaching practices in U.S. dental schools and medical evidence. Dental faculty should consider comparing their teaching material with evidence regarding anticoagulation and dental procedures. Continuing education may be necessary for practicing dentists regarding this topic.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Dent EducHome page
K. Hannes, D. Norre, J. Goedhuys, I. Naert, and B. Aertgeerts
Obstacles to Implementing Evidence-Based Dentistry: A Focus Group-Based Study
J Dent Educ., June 1, 2008; 72(6): 736 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Dental Education Association.