Leadership Development in Dental Education: Report on the ADEA Leadership Institute, 2000–08
N. Karl Haden, Ph.D.;
Richard R. Ranney, D.D.S., M.S.;
George Weinstein, M.B.A.;
Larry C. Breeding, D.M.D., M.S.;
Jack E. Bresch, M.A.L.S.;
Richard W. Valachovic, D.M.D., M.P.H.
This report describes participants assessment of theirexperiences in the American Dental Education Association (ADEA)Leadership Institute program. The ADEA Leadership Instituteis designed for mid-career faculty members who desire to attainadministrative roles within their own or other institutionsor enhance their effectiveness in these roles. This year-longprogram, conducted in four phases, is ADEAs flagshipcareer enhancement program and provides dental educators withperspectives about oral health policy and legislation, organizationand financing of higher education, the dental schoolsrole within the parent institution, financial management, legalissues, recruiting faculty, and opportunities to acquire andpractice skills associated with effective leadership. ADEA LeadershipInstitute Fellows also explore team-building, personality preferences,leadership styles, emotional intelligence, stress management,work-life balance, strategies for leading change, and givingand receiving feedback, as well as engaging in self- and peerassessment throughout the year. Each year up to twenty-one fellowsare selected to participate in the institute in a competitiveapplication process. In 2009, 149 fellows who participated inthe institute from 2000 to 2008 were invited to take part ina survey to establish their profiles and academic leadershiproles, determine their perceptions of the benefits from theinstitute curriculum, and elicit their suggestions for improvement.The survey response rate was 73 percent (n=109). Ninety-ninepercent of respondents gave an overall positive assessment oftheir experiences. The most beneficial experiences, accordingto respondents, included networking with the program participants,advisors, and instructors (78 percent); self-discovery throughself-assessments and evaluations (44 percent); and a 360°feedback process to provide additional reflection about areasfor improvement (17 percent). Least beneficial experiences identifiedby survey respondents included sessions devoted to oral healthlegislation (33 percent), group projects (28 percent), and mentorshipreceived during the institute year (12 percent). In the finalpart of the survey, participants provided suggestions for improvementsand new areas for program planners to consider. Additions tothe current curriculum (30 percent)—such as how to recruitand retain faculty—and advanced leadership training (15percent)—including behavioral change theory—toppedthe improvement list. The results of this study indicate thatthe ADEA Leadership Institute is fulfilling its mission. Fellowsare advancing in their careers and assuming administrative leadershiproles within their home institutions while making scholarlycontributions to the literature and undertaking leadership positionsin ADEA.