JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 68(7_suppl): 41-44 2004
© 2004 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zarkowski, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silverton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zarkowski, P.

Working Together for Change

Women and Family Health and Oral Health: A Working Group Report

Susan Silverton, M.D., Ph.D.; Pamela Zarkowski, M.P.H., J.D.

Our purpose is to report on the completion of an "environmental scan" concerning the relationship between family health and oral health and the interface with government, society, and family responsibilities. For purposes of this report, oral health includes caries, periodontal, mucosal infections, oral and pharyngeal cancers, development disorders, malocclusion, and trauma. Oral health is considered for all demographic categories, from infants to elders and with consideration for women’s oral health in the discussion. Family health is defined as other health conditions including but not limited to physical, mental, social, and emotional health.

The outcomes of this working group discussion on women and family health and oral health during the 2nd International Women’s Leadership Conference provide a foundation for a future symposium that will discuss potential directions and roles of government, society, family, and the dental profession in addressing oral and family health.


   Issues Discussed by the Working Group
 Top
 Issues discussed by the...
 Topics of the environmental...
 Outcomes of discussion
 
The following questions were considered by this group.

Role of Government.
Are there models where the government is appropriately addressing oral and family health to the satisfaction of oral health care providers? If so where? Should government take a more active role? How? Are there models where that occurs successfully? What are the pitfalls? Identify strategies where key individuals in government positions can be made aware of the importance of oral health and its connection to general health. Discuss specific oral health conditions that could be addressed through government or public health-based consortiums or groups.

Role of Society.
How do cultural, family, religious, and other social groups currently impact on oral health and family health? Are there advantages and disadvantages to using the formal or informal networks within a particular locale or country? Are there methods to "educate" society about its obligations to attaining and maintaining oral health for all its citizens? How?

Role of Family.
Who has the current responsibility for oral and general health in the family unit? Is that satisfactory? Can there be a change? If so, how can that be accomplished in the future? Can there be linkages developed to assist families in improving their knowledge and skills? How does culture, religion, etc. play a role?

Role of Profession.
What is the current role of oral health and health professionals? Are they providers, initiators, prevention advocates, or educators? Are there any innovative programs utilizing auxiliary oral health professionals that could impact on oral health and general health? Is there potential to develop linkages with other health professionals, interdisciplinary services, education, or planning?

Role of Education.
Is professional education addressing oral and family health? Are the linkages between oral health and systemic health included in professional education and/or continuing education? Can dental schools and medical schools develop collaborative models with practitioners, both oral and general health, to address the needs in a community?

Role of the Corporate Sector.
What are the responsibilities of the corporate sector for oral health and general health? How might the corporate sector contribute to the resolution of the issues raised?


   Topics of the Environmental Scan
 Top
 Issues discussed by the...
 Topics of the environmental...
 Outcomes of discussion
 
The group discussion was founded on six underlying topic areas intersecting health and oral health and three specific questions framing the diseases of oral health. Participation by representatives from several countries (Sweden, Finland, Bulgaria, United States) and states/territories (Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Michigan, and Puerto Rico) resulted in a spectrum of answers to the framing questions (see Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Issues considered in the environmental scan and examples of points raised in the working group
 
Several programs described are directed toward specific populations, primarily children, and are supported by state or federal funding. There was corporate sponsorship for some of the programs described. Some of the programs were diagnostic or treatment interventions; others were educational and/or preventive. Reimbursement was discussed as well as different governmental and societal philosophies toward health and oral health.

The underlying topic areas and specific oral health questions were:

  1. Where does the responsibility for family health lie?
  2. Where does the responsibility for family oral health lie?
  3. Who is responsible for paying for family health?
  4. Who is responsible for paying for family oral health?
  5. What are the origins of information on family health?
  6. What are the origins of information on family oral health?


   Outcomes of Discussion
 Top
 Issues discussed by the...
 Topics of the environmental...
 Outcomes of discussion
 
The participants engaged in a discussion that included descriptions of specific programs, strengths and weaknesses of current programs addressing oral and general health, and comments about future directions that local, regional, or government agencies could pursue (see Table 2Go). The international composition of the discussion group highlighted varying priorities and approaches to oral health care delivery. For example, in Finland and Sweden, the needs of children and elders guide the government-sponsored delivery system. The focus of the future will include emphasis on primary prevention with access not dependent on socioeconomic status.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Strategies/opportunities: some key discussion points suggested by working group participants
 
Participants agreed that cultural competency and sensitivity were critical in the planning and implementation of programs. One commentator indicated that, even within individual countries, an educational or service program successful in one region of the country may need to be modified in another region due to differing cultural or social customs.

All members of the discussion group agreed that family influence in seeking and cooperating in oral health care is important. In some instances, participants in a program may be first-generation dental patients. Thus, a family-centered as well as patient-centered approach is critical to success.

Linkage between oral health care professionals and other health care professionals, especially physicians, was suggested. This linkage is especially important as the relationship of oral health and general health continues to become evident. Community and individual education about oral health status, prevention, and health promotion must be evidence-based.

Some participants suggested that future strategies should include mechanisms to reward changes in behaviors that impact on health, such as smoking cessation. The valuable role of supportive corporations that are interested in supporting oral health prevention and education was suggested. Corporate support can include both financial and advisory personnel. All participants agreed that corporate support is valued and encouraged on all levels from program planning to implementation and evaluation.

Overall, the discussion provided insights into current successes and initiatives in the United States and throughout the world. All participants agreed that additional opportunities for discussion were critical. It was agreed to develop a listserv that included all participants as a resource for discussion and information.

Recommendations for symposia discussions and policy change included the following:


   Footnotes
 
Dr. Silverton is Associate Dean of Research, University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Dentistry and Professor of Biological Sciences, UNLV College of Sciences; Prof. Zarkowski is Associate Dean for Academic Administration and Professor, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry. Direct correspondence to Dr. Silverton at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, School of Dentistry, 1001 Shadow Lane, MS 7410, Las Vegas, NM 89106-4124; 702-895-2885 phone; 702-985-2025 fax; sfsilverton{at}ccmail.nevada.edu.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zarkowski, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silverton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zarkowski, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS