JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 70(11_suppl): 54-55 2006
© 2006 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverton, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Silverton, S.

Mentoring, Role Modeling, and Networking: Personal Perspectives

Strategies for Success in the Leadership Triad: A Working Group Report

Susan Silverton, M.D., Ph.D.

This working group included around two dozen women from several countries. Participants considered the following questions about leadership by women:

  1. Is leadership gender-specific?
  2. Are there barriers to leadership programs for women?
  3. Are there specific strategies to overcome gender barriers to leadership?
  4. Can we identify distinct leadership issues that might benefit from further research?

After a brief introduction, the group was broken down into three tables of six to eight. The women worked together on two tasks: 1) give an example of a barrier to women’s leadership, and 2) develop a strategy to overcome the barrier(s) you discovered. Groups handed in their reports with lists of barriers and strategies to overcome the barriers. Barriers were grouped into three qualitatively different areas: barriers to following a leadership track, barriers to being a woman leader, and barriers of gender and status.

In the first area, "Barriers to Following a Leadership Track," initial barriers to following a leadership track were identified as lack of time and inadequate personal skills to pursue leadership. Participants felt that women and men had higher expectations of women leaders, raising the bar for women following a leadership track. Some participants expressed the difficulty of being heard, describing a communication gap between women and those in power. Many participants commented on the lack of mentors and the difficulty of following a leadership track in the absence of a support group. Women faculty commented that traditional tenure, promotion policies, and culture are not conducive to the collaborative working style of many women. They also noted programmatic rigidity and inflexibility in their institutions. Participants pointed out the combination of barriers as challenges to women following a leadership track.

In the second area, "Barriers to Being a Woman Leader," while the barriers to following a leadership track were clearly identified as a disincentive to pursuing leadership, participants were also concerned about the challenges women leaders face once they have navigated the initial obstacles to becoming a leader. Many participants referred to male domination, or the "old boys’ club," to express their sense of being excluded from group support even though they had obtained leadership credentials and responsibilities. Several participants saw a critical transition point between following a leadership track and "doing it all" and continuing a dysfunctional inability to delegate responsibilities once their leadership becomes a reality. Participants worried about a possible sacrifice of personal values as their power as a leader increases: that is, "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely." Some participants mentioned their perception that, in some organizations, women’s leadership may be viewed as a threat rather than being accepted. The group discussed why women let men take credit for something that was a shared success when men would not tolerate being left out of the credits if they had shared responsibility for the endeavor. Participants saw themselves competing with other women for scarce resources instead of participating in an equitable division of resources and labor.

In the third area, "Barriers of Gender and Status," participants made the following points: women and men see different barriers to success; male peer groups may not meet the needs of women; money and resources are not equitably apportioned between men and women; women have narrowly defined descriptions for acceptable behavior; family status in the community defines women’s status; family responsibilities are not shared equally between men and women; and there are no reentry points into leadership for women.

The working group also developed a list of recommended strategies for each of the three areas.


   Strategies for Pursuing Leadership
 Top
 Strategies for pursuing...
 Strategies for being a...
 Strategies for supporting gender...
 


   Strategies for Being a Leader
 Top
 Strategies for pursuing...
 Strategies for being a...
 Strategies for supporting gender...
 


   Strategies for Supporting Gender Values Positively
 Top
 Strategies for pursuing...
 Strategies for being a...
 Strategies for supporting gender...
 


   Footnotes
 
Dr. Silverton is Vice President, Academic Affairs, at Laurentian University, Ontario, Canada. Direct correspondence to her at Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 2C6, Canada; 705-675-1151, ext. 3402 phone; 705-673-6522 fax; ssilverton{at}laurentian.ca.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverton, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Silverton, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS