JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 70(3): 225-230 2006
© 2006 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glotzer, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alfano, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glotzer, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alfano, M. C.

Educational Methodologies

Introducing a Senior Course on Catastrophe Preparedness into the Dental School Curriculum

David L. Glotzer, D.D.S.; Frederick G. More, D.D.S., M.S.; Joan Phelan, D.D.S., M.S.; Robert Boylan, Ph.D.; Walter Psoter, D.D.S., Ph.D.; Miriam Robbins, D.D.S., M.S.; E. Dianne Rekow, Ph.D., D.D.S.; Benjamin Godder, D.M.D.; Michael C. Alfano, D.M.D., Ph.D.

Key words: catastrophe preparedness, dental school curriculum, senior dental students, competencies

Submitted for publication 08/16/05; accepted 11/01/05


   Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Nyucd's catastrophe preparedness...
 Conclusion
 References
 
This article describes an integrated fourth-year course in catastrophe preparedness for students at the New York University College of Dentistry (NYUCD). The curriculum is built around the competencies proposed in "Predoctoral Dental School Curriculum for Catastrophe Preparedness," published in the August 2004 Journal of Dental Education. We highlight our experience developing the program and offer suggestions to other dental schools considering adding bioterrorism studies to their curriculum.


Due to the changes this nation has undergone since September 11, 2001, the need for a large force of health care providers trained to react to a major disaster in a surge environment, where the need for medical services far exceeds the resources available, has grown considerably. In an attempt to ensure that the public and private health care systems in the United States are capable of responding to emergencies, the federal government has directed financial and logistic resources to strengthen the emergency-response system, create medication stockpiles, and improve the public health infrastructure. Emergency medicine will always have to be ready to confront another crisis, and in many of these catastrophic events, as we have recently seen during Katrina, the emergency medical system itself may be overwhelmed and/or totally crippled. As a consequence of the heightened awareness and needs associated with emergency response, new requirements have been proposed for the dental profession to help meet the special needs of society in the event of a disaster.

In June 2002 the American Dental Association (ADA) held a meeting to identify potential roles for dentists in response to a bioterrorism attack. One area of concern expressed at that time was what role dental schools should play in emergency preparedness. The participants at this meeting concluded that bioterrorism training should occur in the predoctoral dental curriculum and should include training that allows dental students to recognize disease, aid in triage, implement preventive measures, and assist in treatment under the direction of emergency-response agencies.1

In this article we describe New York University College of Dentistry’s (NYUCD) effort to build a catastrophe preparedness curriculum for our predoctoral students. The faculty of NYUCD used the competencies, goals, and objectives as proposed by More et al. for the development of this curriculum (see Table 1Go). These competencies are based on the recognition that the knowledge and skills possessed by the average dental student upon graduation may be utilized by the public health care system in times of crisis.2


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Catastrophe preparedness competencies
 

   NYUCD’s Catastrophe Preparedness Curriculum
 Top
 Abstract
 Nyucd's catastrophe preparedness...
 Conclusion
 References
 
NYUCD has implemented a new experience for a dental student that incorporates four components: curriculum integration, modular components, an actively participating senior course, and continuous evaluation. Initial outcomes assessment indicated a very positive response from the NYUCD graduating class of 2005.3

Supplemental Units in the First Three Years
NYUCD has approximately 340 students enrolled in the senior class (D4). Freshmen, sophomores, and juniors are introduced to the subject of bioterrorism preparedness by supplementing the established curriculum with units of instruction in modular form, as follows:

Freshman Curriculum (D1): Shelter in Place, Emergency Evacuations, and Fire Hazard, as part of the freshman orientation. Total D1: 1.0 hour.

Sophomore Curriculum (D2): Students are introduced to pathogens that can be used as agents of bioterrorism during the General Pathology and Infectious Diseases course. Total D2: 7 hours. Topics include:

Junior Curriculum (D3): Students are introduced to oral and systemic manifestations of bioterrorist agents including clinical signs and symptoms. This topic is introduced as part of the course entitled "Care of the Medically Complex Patients." Total D3: 3 hours. Topics addressed are:

Senior Curriculum (D4)
After experiencing this curriculum during their first three years, the senior students (D4s) have already acquired the basic foundation knowledge in the biomedical sciences, including biological agents; knowledge of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) weapons; CPR training; wound management; and infection control procedures. In addition, they have experienced the impact of an ethics course that explores a dentist’s obligation to the community.

After developing the core educational content for the first three years of the curriculum, the faculty addressed the challenge of developing a stand-alone D4 program that would build on the previously described curriculum components and work in conjunction with their senior-year patient care and patient management experience.

Key questions included:

With these questions guiding the planning process, a fourth-year course was developed for implementation in the spring semester within two months of graduation. Many senior dental students at that time of the year are deeply concerned with passing regional licensing examinations, completing their curriculum requirements, and preparing for their professional futures. Based on our knowledge of typical senior students’ priorities and distractions during their last semester in dental school, it was evident that the emergency preparedness course material had to be presented in a particularly stimulating and attention-grabbing manner.

The course developed for these fourth-year dental students was organized around four questions:

  1. Why should dentists be concerned and involved?
  2. How can dentists respond to a catastrophe as part of the organized public health response system?
  3. What additional practical training is useful for dentists?
  4. How can the average general dentists prepare to protect themselves if a disaster occurs when they are in their offices?

The first question—why should dentists be concerned and involved with catastrophe preparedness?—is of such critical importance that it was addressed in an introductory lecture delivered by the dean of the dental school. The lecture emphasized to the students their obligation to the profession, to the community, to their own families, and to their country. The lecture reminded students of the skills they bring with them in the event of an emergency. The opportunities available to join an organized response effort such as the Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) are discussed. Additionally, the dean described the abilities that graduate dentists can utilize in an emergency situation; for example, if dentists can accurately administer an inferior alveolar nerve block injection in the recesses of the mouth, they can certainly "hit" the large deltoid muscle in the arm to administer a smallpox vaccination with minimal training.4

The second course theme addressed the question of why dentists should participate in the community’s established and organized disaster response system. The approach taken to achieve this objective was to use an existing surge response public health mechanism. NYUCD has had a close relationship with the New York City Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) for several years, ever since NYUCD and the city conducted a simulated Point of Dispensing (POD) exercise together. The MRC developed by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) consists of a multidisciplinary group of volunteer health professionals, including physicians, pharmacists, dentists, nurses, mental health practitioners, and others, who can be mobilized rapidly during a public health emergency. The MRC/NYC works in partnership with professional associations, universities, and hospitals. As an example, a bioterrorist attack may require mass antibiotic/vaccination prophylaxis. To dispense antibiotics or vaccine to the public, Point-of-Dispensing clinics (PODs) would be set up. POD functions include medical evaluation, triage, vaccination or distribution of medication, and line management. Clinical/support roles are assigned to each professional based on his or her skills and licensure.5

During a three-hour POD drill, with an improvised scenario, the NYUCD’s main auditorium was transformed into a smallpox vaccine dispensing center as our senior students acted as both members of the MRC (triaging, evaluating, dispensing, and inoculating the public) and as patients eagerly looking for answers and protection. The exercise was filmed for use in future classes and to help demonstrate that dentists, with their strong background in infection control, biological agents, collecting medical histories, and patient management, can relatively quickly be organized into an effective, much-needed component of the catastrophe response system.

The third theme of the D4 course addressed the question "What additional practical training is useful for dentists?" In 2003, the American Medical Association (AMA), in partnership with four major medical centers and three national health organizations, established the National Disaster Life Support (NDLS) training program to better prepare health care professionals and emergency response personnel for mass casualty events. The NDLS courses stress a comprehensive all-hazards approach to help physicians and other health professionals deal with catastrophic emergencies from terrorist acts as well as from explosions, fires, natural disasters (such as hurricanes and floods), and infectious diseases. The program consists of three levels of courses of increasing clinical complexity: 1) Core Disaster Life Support (CDLS), 2) Basic Disaster Life Support (BDLS), and 3) Advanced Disaster Life Support (ADLS).6

The first component (CDLS) of this hierarchal set of training courses was chosen for its practicality and to introduce those students interested in this material to the possibilities for further training. Core Disaster Life Support is a four-hour instructor-led course designed for all public health care personnel and social workers, clergy, mental health personnel, and planners. CDLS is intended to provide a basic uniform standard of competencies, skills, and knowledge to health care and public health responders for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) response. There was strong agreement among the faculty involved in our bioterrorism preparedness curriculum that since this "formal" presentation already existed, there was no need to initiate and develop another appropriate program.

In the CDLS course, participants learn to:

After presentation of the course and a short twenty-five-question examination, the AMA offers a certificate of completion with name and degree to each participant. Three hundred and twenty of NYUCD’s senior students who graduated in 2005 completed the CDLS course and received certification. It was very rewarding to see how proud our seniors were of their certificates and the fact that they had completed formal training in Core Disaster Life Support.

The fourth component of the D4 catastrophe preparedness curriculum addresses awareness and personal protection. NYUCD has an active Emergency Plan and a Shelter-in–Place protocol in place. This is a plan that would allow the college to prepare, respond, and recover from any man-made or natural disaster during the first seventy-two hours of an incident. It is focused on the realization that the major decision to be made is whether we should evacuate the building or use the inherent protection of the structure to shelter in place. The NYUCD student body is therefore aware of the need for anticipating and planning for a possible attack or disaster. It has been shown that the positive behavioral response of individuals goes a long way toward mitigating the consequences of a serious event and has important implications for the practical management of a disaster scene.

Using this as the basis to achieve the final course objective, the senior students were required to work in groups of four, on their own time, to develop either an evacuation and/or a shelter-in-place plan for the type of dental office or clinic in which they plan to practice. Students could tailor the plan to a specific bioterrorist agent (for example, a dirty bomb, sarin gas, a biological weapon) or make it generic for either a natural or a man-made disaster. Interestingly, many students used a likely event related to the particular state in which they thought they would practice. Earthquakes were an issue for those who planned for California, tornadoes for the potential midwesterners, and hurricane-related damage in the Southeast.

Faculty with a strong background in catastrophe preparedness then selected and presented to the whole class the more interestingly detailed and thought-provoking scenarios submitted and moderated the class discussions that followed.7

At the completion of this first-time course, the dean and the curriculum committee were interested in determining if the curriculum helped students achieve the bioterrorism competencies in the predoctoral dental curriculum. Evaluation questions included:

  1. Did students graduate with sufficient knowledge of the clinical signs and symptoms and prevention strategies of the most likely bioterrorist agents (Class A agents)?
  2. Did students graduate sufficiently empowered to react positively to protect their patients, staff, families, and themselves from the multiple hazards of these agents and other hazards?
  3. Did students graduate with sufficient knowledge of the resources available to improve and sharpen their skills and to familiarize themselves with their community response plan?
  4. Most importantly, did students graduate with a desire and willingness to contribute to catastrophe preparedness with an understanding of the ethical issues and obligations involved?

To assess these questions, a survey was developed as a pre-test and post-test to assess the attitude of the D4 students about various aspects of catastrophe preparedness. The underlying assumption was that students’ attitudes about catastrophe preparedness would be changed as a consequence of the curriculum experiences described in this article. A survey (which had received an IRB-exempt designation) was administered on the first day of the D4 course. The survey appears in Figure 1Go. Senior students were requested to self-assess their knowledge about bioterrorism and their confidence in their competency on that issue. The same survey was administered after the course.


Figure 1
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Students’ self-assessment survey

 
The preliminary data from the pilot program suggested that student attitudes were changed after the course. They saw more aspects of catastrophe preparedness as "important" and said the program made them feel more "confident" to assume a role as a responder.3 We describe only the initial impressions of data here because we have yet to have it fully statistically analyzed and it is secondary to the description of the program this article presents—a program that we feel should invoke discussion and debate in the dental academic community. It is our intention to analyze the data and present the findings of the student assessment in a future article that will offer a full and complete picture of the students’ response. Following the initial More et al. article and this current article, an analytical third article would complete the sequence regarding catastrophic preparedness training for dental students.


   Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Nyucd's catastrophe preparedness...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The senior curriculum described in this article consists of twelve hours of organized presentations, roleplaying, and seminars. At NYUCD, we believe a capstone course of this nature goes a long way in fulfilling the community obligation for dental schools to train dentists in the core competencies required to be able to lend additional support to the public health infrastructure in a surge environment.

A recent feature article in the New York Times describing NYUCD’s unique efforts in mandating terrorism preparedness for its students summed up the college’s goal: "All graduates are now required to have a fundamental working knowledge of the proper response to a variety of natural and terrorist threats."8


   Footnotes
 
Dr. Glotzer is Clinical Professor, Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry; Dr. More is Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Department of Pediatric Dentistry; Dr. Phelan is Professor and Chair, Department of Oral Pathology; Dr. Boylan is Associate Professor, Department of Basic Science and Craniofacial Biology; Dr. Psoter is Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University and Associate Professor, School of Dentistry, University of Puerto Rico; Dr. Robbins is Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Oral Medicine; Dr. Rekow is Professor and Director for Translational Research, Department of Basic Science and Craniofacial Biology, Department of Orthodontics; Dr. Godder is Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry; and Dr. Alfano is Dean and Professor, Department of Basic Science and Craniofacial Biology, Department of Periodontics—all at New York University College of Dentistry. Direct correspondence and requests for reprints to Dr. David L. Glotzer, 423 East 23rd Street, 16 N, New York, NY 10010; 212-998-9625 phone; 212-995-4119 fax; dlg2{at}nyu.edu.


   REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Nyucd's catastrophe preparedness...
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Guay AH. Dentistry’s response to bioterrorism: a report of a consensus workshop. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133(Sept.):1181–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. More FG, Phelan J, Boylan R, Glotzer DL, Psoter W, Robbins M, et al. Predoctoral dental school curriculum for catastrophe preparedness. J Dent Educ 2004;68: 851–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. More FG, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, NYUCD. Personal communication, June 2005.
  4. Focus of NYS Dental Foundation Conference is bio-terrorism and public health emergencies. N Y State Dent J 2004;70(May):5.[Medline]
  5. Medical Reserve Corps/NYC. At: www.gnyha.org/eprc/general/presentations/20040809_mrc-nyc.pdf. Accessed: July 25, 2005.
  6. AMA Center for Public Health Preparedness and Disaster Response. At: www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/12607.html. Accessed: July 25, 2005.
  7. Glotzer DL, More FG. Compilation of senior dental student submissions on Protective Action Plans submitted as course requirement. New York: New York University College of Dentistry, 2005.
  8. Morgan R. Dentists prepared to be on front line of civil defense. The New York Times, August 2, 2005, F6.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
W. J. Psoter, P. J. Park, R. J. Boylan, D. E. Morse, and D. L. Glotzer
National Emergency Response Programs for Dental Health Care Professionals
J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2008; 139(8): 1067 - 1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
M. D. Colvard, M. I. Naiman, D. Mata, G. A. Cordell, and L. Lampiris
Disaster medicine training survey results for dental health care providers in Illinois
J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2007; 138(4): 519 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glotzer, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alfano, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glotzer, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alfano, M. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS