JDE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Educ. 71(5): 569-570 2007
© 2007 American Dental Education Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. N.

Supporting the Evolution of Clinical Education

John N. Williams, D.M.D., M.B.A., Dean  

Dear Dr. Alvares:

I read with great interest the Formicola et al. article entitled "Evolution of Dental School Clinics as Patient Care Delivery Centers" in the December 2006 Journal of Dental Education. As dean at the University of Louisville School of Dentistry during the evolution in the clinical education program, I want to add some additional perspective about the educational changes that were successfully made.

First, I compliment the willingness of the Louisville faculty to undertake a major clinical change and explore a new way of educating dental students. Their dedication to and concern for students are remarkable, even passionate in some cases. I saw their willingness to change and appreciated their hard work and commitment.

Second, the University of Louisville financial climate in 1999 to 2004 had another impact on our ability to maximize clinic changes because the state imposed dramatic budget cuts over these years. In response, the university implemented significant tuition increases for the dental school, which were mostly retained by the central university. If the financial environment had been more stable, the gains from productivity increases derived from the new clinic system could have been used to hire additional generalist faculty and compensate the group managers at a more competitive level. Outstanding generalist faculty can be recruited, but we must adequately compensate them for the roles they take in the leadership of group practice management and teaching.

Third, the increase in clinic productivity, while measured by real increases in clinic revenue, is really a proxy measure of the student experience gained by treating more patients. Deans are typically concerned with finances, but clinical education is all about our students gaining sufficient clinical experience to best prepare them to function as independent beginning practitioners. As educators, we have an obligation to provide them with maximal clinical experience—which is happening at Louisville.

We need to continue to try new things. I applaud the efforts of Dr. Formicola and his coauthors in sharing these three cases of clinical education for our consideration. I look forward to continuation of this evolution, which was enhanced in the 1920s by Dean Alfred Owre at Columbia University and continues to this day.

Footnotes

School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7450, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, 919-966-2731 phone; 919-966-4040 fax john_williams{at}dentistry.unc.edu





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS