Abstract
This Point/Counterpoint article examines the need for and potential impact of implementing a national clinical examination for initial licensure in dentistry. Viewpoint 1 supports a national licensure exam that meets the clinical exam’s credentialing requirement for licensure in every state. According to this viewpoint, a national exam will reduce costs, enhance portability of graduates, simplify the transition from dental school to practice or specialty training programs, and standardize requirements for licensure between states. Viewpoint 2 opposes a national licensure exam. This viewpoint supports individual states’ dental board decision making process, which is based on identifiable state-specific criteria. The ability to prioritize needs at the state level allows for higher exam standards, easier modifications, more focused requirements, and better calibration in specific exam areas. Viewpoint 2 argues that the delicate balance between licensure agencies and organized dentistry in each state, as well as the involvement of dental schools in the licensure process, must be preserved. This Point/Counterpoint concludes with a joint statement about the prospects for adoption of a national licensure exam.
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Please log in using your adea.org credentials. The JDE website is no longer issuing separate usernames for journal access. Don't know your username?
Before logging in with your ADEA.org credentials the first time, we recommend clearing your browser cache and cookies.
Subscribers and ADEA members:
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Purchase access
For more Information:
Check ADEA's website to learn about JDE subscriptions or ADEA membership and member benefits.
Contact us at publications@adea.org or (US) 202-962-9113.