Table 4.

Results of the fourth-year student satisfaction survey

1. Does the Non-Graded Clinical Evaluation System provide a better learning environment?
Much BetterSomewhat BetterNeutralSomewhat WorseMuch Worse
43.8%34.8%18.0%2.2%1.1%
2. Were your interactions with clinical faculty improved using the Non-Graded Clinical Evaluation System?
Much ImprovedSomewhat ImprovedNeutralSomewhat WorseMuch Worse
36.0%41.6%19.1%2.2%1.1%
3. Did you receive more comments that helped you improve your technique using the Non-Graded Clinical Evaluation System?
A Lot MoreA Few MoreAbout the SameA Few LessA Lot Less
27.0%40.4%27.0%3.4%2.2%
4. Was the clinic environment less stressful using the Non-Graded Clinical Evaluation System?
Much Less StressLess StressNo DifferenceMore StressMuch More Stress
39.3%32.6%25.8%1.1%1.1%
5. Do you feel that your performance was adequately evaluated under the Non-Graded Clinical Evaluation System?
85.4% Yes14.6% No
6. If you had concerns about the Non-Graded Clinical Evaluation System, were they addressed?
82.0% Yes18.0% No
7. Would you recommend the Non-Graded Clinical Evaluation System be instituted for the 3rd year as well?
Strongly RecommendRecommendNeutralNot RecommendStrongly Not Recommend
39.3%31.5%15.7%9.0%4.5%